Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
Comparison of 2 systems for clinical practice profiling in diabetic care: medical records versus claims and
J Ross Maclean1, Donna M Fick, Wayne K Hoffman
1Department of Medicine, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta 30912, USA. rmaclean@mail.mcg.edu
Insights
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing and control rates were evaluated in primary care. Academic medical centers showed higher HbA1c testing rates than health maintenance organizations, highlighting data system challenges.
Area of Science:
- Diabetes Mellitus Management
- Healthcare Quality Measurement
- Clinical Practice Profiling
Background:
- Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a key marker for diabetes mellitus control.
- Accurate measurement of HbA1c testing and control rates is crucial for assessing healthcare quality.
- Discrepancies in data collection between healthcare systems can impact performance measurement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the rate of HbA1c testing and control in an academic medical center primary care clinic.
- To compare HbA1c testing data between an academic medical center and a health maintenance organization for a shared patient cohort.
- To identify challenges in accurately profiling clinical practice based on available data.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of medical records, claims, and administrative data.
- Review of 300 patient records with diabetes mellitus from an academic medical center.
- Adherence to National Committee for Quality Assurance guidelines for data collection.
Main Results:
- 91.7% of patients at the academic medical center had documented HbA1c tests.
- 74.9% of tested patients achieved good glycemic control (HbA1c ≤ 9.5%).
- HbA1c testing rates were significantly higher at the academic medical center (92.7%) compared to the HMO (36.3%) based on claims data.
Conclusions:
- Administrative and claims data systems have limitations for accurate performance measurement.
- Sole reliance on medical record review for quality assessment is resource-intensive.
- Integrated data tracking across healthcare systems is necessary for comprehensive quality reporting.
Objectives:
To (1) describe the rate of glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) testing and control in a primary care clinic at an academic medical center; (2) compare academic medical center and health maintenance organization (HMO) data for a subgroup of the same patients; and (3) discuss the challenges to accurate clinical practice profiling.
Study Design:
Retrospective analysis of medical records and claims and administrative data.
Patients And Methods:
We reviewed the medical records of 300 patients with diabetes mellitus from the Primary Care practice at an academic medical center (AMC). The HMO and AMC were in the southeastern United States. The study adhered to the National Committee for Quality Assurance's Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set 3.0 (1998) guidelines for collection of the numerator and denominator data.
Results:
Overall, 275 (91.7%) of 300 patients underwent a documented HbA1c test (range, 77.8%-98.0% across the 5 Primary Care Associates clinic physicians). Of these 275 patients, 206 (74.9%; range, 52.4%-84.7%) were under "good control" (defined by the National Committee for Quality Assurance as an HbA1c level of < or = 9.5%). The mean (SD) HbA1c level was 8.45% (1.98%). Data from the HMO documented a rate of HbA1c testing of 36.3% (45/124) compared with 92.7% (115/124) based on case note review at the academic medical center.
Conclusions:
Current administrative and claims-based information systems have inherent weaknesses if used for performance measurement. Reliance solely on medical record review is time and cost prohibitive. To ensure complete reporting of mandated "quality measures" will necessitate the tracking of data across different healthcare systems.
Related Concept Videos
Health Information Technology and Healthcare Information System
Health Information Technology, commonly called HIT, integrates advanced information systems and technology in healthcare settings. Its primary functions include:
Methods of Documentation VI: Case Management Model
For example, a patient with a chronic illness...
Methods of Documentation VII: EMR
Purpose of Health Records I
Here's a breakdown of how health records serve these purposes:
Methods of Documentation V: CBE
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Types of Records II: Educational and Administrative Records