Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Quality Assurance01:19

Quality Assurance

922
Quality assurance is the overarching term used to describe the activities employed to ensure the proper performance of a system. These activities can be classified into three categories: quality control, quality assessment, and internal corrective measures. Typically, these activities work cyclically: quality control is performed before and during the analysis, while quality assessment occurs during and after the investigation. Internal corrective measures are implemented based on the findings...
922
Quality Control01:05

Quality Control

1.2K
Quality control is one of the three cyclical quality assurance activities that help keep a system under statistical control. Typical quality control activities include creating quality control charts, conducting proficiency testing, and documenting and archiving results.
Quality control helps track data, visualize trends, and identify variations, making it easier to detect deviations that may affect the accuracy of an analysis. One way to do this is by generating a quality control chart, which...
1.2K
Quality of Water01:19

Quality of Water

465
In concrete preparation, the quality of water is paramount as it affects the strength and durability of the concrete. Potable water is usually preferred; however, it must not have excessive sodium or potassium to prevent compromising the concrete's integrity. Water quality is typically evaluated based on impurities such as dissolved solids, chlorides, and sulfates, and its pH value is ideally between 6 and 8. Even slightly acidic natural water may be acceptable unless it contains harmful...
465
Planning Nursing Care I01:21

Planning Nursing Care I

5.5K
The planning phase of the nursing process helps nurses set priorities, outline patient-centered goals and expected outcomes, and tailor nursing interventions to align with the aligned care plan. Through the planning phase, the nurse applies critical thinking skills to align and develop interventions according to the patient's needs. It provides continuity of care allowing patients to receive the maximum benefit from treatment. It serves as a pilot plan for allocating individual staff to a...
5.5K
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

2.0K
Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
2.0K
Pulse amplitude and quality01:17

Pulse amplitude and quality

2.9K
Pulse amplitude is a crucial indicator of cardiac health because it provides valuable insights into the strength of left ventricular contractions and the overall uniformity of blood circulation within the vasculature. The strength of the pulse is directly related to the force with which the heart contracts and the volume of blood being pumped.
A weak or absent pulse may indicate reduced cardiac output or poor left ventricular contraction, which can be signs of cardiovascular dysfunction or...
2.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Responsible management of motor vehicle drivers with dementia.

The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh·2014
Same author

Validity of the indicator 'death in low-mortality diagnosis-related groups' for measuring patient safety and healthcare quality in hospitals.

Internal medicine journal·2010
Same author

Resilience in healthcare and clinical handover.

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

Improving measurement in clinical handover.

Quality & safety in health care·2009
Same author

World without borders: integrating clinical perspectives into the coronial jurisdiction in Victoria, Australia.

Medicine and law·2006
Same author

Making the case for more necropsies to improve patient care.

Quality & safety in health care·2006
Same journal

Phenomenon of quality and health-care.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Aspects of the Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Rational prescribing for childhood pneumonia.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Quality management and the Emergency Services Enhancement Program.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Eradicating Helicobacter pylori in patients with a past history of peptic ulcer: is the juice worth the squeeze?

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
Same journal

Ensuring accuracy of clinical data is only part of the audit process.

Journal of quality in clinical practice·2002
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K

Prioritising quality.

J E Ibrahim1

  • 1Board of Censors, Australasian Association for Quality in Health Care, Prahran, Victoria 3181, Australia. joseph.ibrahim@med.monash.edu.au

Journal of Quality in Clinical Practice
|February 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Improving patient safety and healthcare quality requires setting priorities. Systematic processes with transparent criteria are essential for effective patient safety initiatives and should be widely adopted.

More Related Videos

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 5, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
06:16

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting

Published on: June 6, 2020

4.2K
A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care
14:32

Using Visual and Narrative Methods to Achieve Fair Process in Clinical Care

Published on: February 16, 2011

24.3K

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Management
  • Patient Safety Research
  • Quality Improvement Science

Background:

  • Numerous initiatives aim to enhance patient safety and healthcare quality.
  • Implementing these solutions necessitates effective priority setting across healthcare levels.
  • A challenge exists in prioritizing from numerous intuitively sensible, yet unvetted, proposals.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To advocate for systematic processes in setting priorities for patient safety and quality improvement initiatives.
  • To highlight the need for explicit and transparent criteria in healthcare priority setting.
  • To encourage the adoption of standardized priority-setting frameworks for future proposals.

Main Methods:

  • Review of current approaches to patient safety and quality improvement.
  • Analysis of the challenges in prioritizing healthcare initiatives.
  • Examination of existing systematic processes for priority setting.

Main Results:

  • The continuous influx of proposals for patient safety and quality improvement presents a prioritization dilemma.
  • Systematic processes with clear, transparent criteria are increasingly being used.
  • These systematic approaches offer a viable solution to the prioritization challenge.

Conclusions:

  • Systematic priority-setting processes with explicit, transparent criteria are crucial for effective patient safety and quality improvement.
  • Wider adoption of these systematic processes is recommended for all future healthcare proposals.
  • Standardized frameworks will ensure that resources are directed towards the most impactful patient safety and quality initiatives.