Is the Degree of Arrhythmia Suppression a Predictor of Survival?

The effectiveness of an antiarrhythmic drug is judged by the degree of ventricular arrhythmia (VA) suppression. We evaluated the relationship between the degree of VA suppression and survival in a dose-adjusted trial of 110 symptomatic patients treated with amiodarone. Cohorts had left-ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of 41 plus minus 18%, ventricular premature contractions (VPCs) of 445 plus minus 571 h, couplets (C) of 733 plus minus 1498 24 h and nonsustained (N) ventricular tachycardia (VT) of 65 plus minus 217 24 h; these conditions were followed for 15 plus minus 11.5 months. Amiodarone was initiated with an oral loading of 670 plus minus 111.7 mg per day for 10 days and continued on maintenance of 274.9 plus minus 102 mg per day. Survival rates of responders and nonresponders with VPCs <70%, 70--89%, greater-than-or-equal90%; C greater-than-or-equal 90%; NVT (100%); and the response to all 3 criteria (suppresion of VPCs greater-than-or-equal70%, C greater-than-or-equal 90% and complete abolition of NVT) were not statistically significant. Survival rates as a function of LVEF <40% (51 patients) or greater-than-or-equal40% (59 patients), as well as responders or nonresponders to all three criteria, were not significant (p = NS). We conclude that, in patients treated with low-dose amiodarone, the degree of VA suppression of PVCs, C and NVT does not predict survival; the survival of patients with LVEF <40% improved irrespective of VA suppression; and criteria for VA suppression should be reassessed at lower levels of suppression for the improvement of the drug risk:benefit ratio. More improvement is not necessarily better.