Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
Published on: January 23, 2017
Rule-governed versus contingency-governed behavior in a self-control task: effects of changes in contingencies
Elizabeth Kudadjie-Gyamfi1, Howard Rachlin
1Department of Psychology, Long Island University, 1 University Plaza, 11201, Brooklyn, NY, USA
Abstract:
Rule-governed behavior is typically acquired faster than contingency-governed behavior but is less sensitive than contingency-governed behavior to unverbalized contingency changes. The present study investigated these relationships in a computer task frequently used to study human self-control. Instructions for one group of participants contained a hint about how to maximize long-term reinforcement; the other group performed the task without the hint. Participants given the hint came closer to maximizing reinforcement in the long term, but their behavior was less sensitive to an unsignaled contingency change than that of those not given the hint. The study shows that, like other complex behaviors, self-control may be contingency-governed or rule-governed.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Operant Conditioning
Reinforcement in operant conditioning can be positive or negative, both of which serve to increase the likelihood of a behavior. Positive...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
Behavior Modification
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Fundamental Attribution Error
Timing and Consequences on Behavior
Humans, however, can respond to delayed reinforcers. We often make decisions between immediate small rewards and delayed larger rewards. This ability to delay gratification is a significant factor...

