Why are we good at detecting cheaters? A reply to Fodor
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime
Published on: May 3, 2016
1Department of Psychology, University of Reading, Earley Gate, Whiteknights, Reading, UK. c.p.beaman@reading.ac.uk
Abstract:
It is argued that the recent criticism by Fodor (Cognition 75 (2000) 29) of "cheater detection" in the Wason selection task is based upon a false presumption about what the task entails. Fodor compares two different ways of presenting the task, rather than two different task domains (social and non-social). Consequently, the conclusion that the selection task can tell us nothing about either the architecture or the history of cognition is invalid. Fodor's explanation of the Wason selection task is examined experimentally and compared to predictions derived from social contract theory (Cognition 31 (1989) 187). It is concluded that, although Fodor's variant of the Wason selection task improves performance, this improvement is independent of the task domain and is insufficient to account for the "cheater detection" effect.
Related Concept Videos
Understanding Deception
Naturalistic Observations
Cause and Effect
Fundamental Attribution Error
Hindsight Biases
Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies
