Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

CO(2) angiography.

Philip R Huber1, Mark E Leimbach, W Lance Lewis

  • 1Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions : Official Journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions
|March 1, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Emory-Gruentzig Days-Birth of a New Field.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2024
Same author

Advocacy for Interventional Cardiologists: Advocate for Change or Be on the Menu.

Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions·2024
Same author

Restrictive Covenants and Noncompete Clauses for Physicians.

JACC. Advances·2024
Same author

Restrictive Covenants and Noncompetes: An ACC Advocacy Journey.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology·2024
Same author

Directional coronary atherectomy revisited.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2022
Same author

Step back to see the complete picture: Complete versus incomplete revascularization of multivessel coronary disease.

Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions·2022

Carbon dioxide angiography offers a safer alternative to iodinated contrast agents for diagnosing and treating peripheral vascular disease, minimizing risks like kidney damage and allergic reactions.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Medicine
  • Interventional Cardiology
  • Radiology

Background:

  • Iodinated contrast agents are standard for diagnosing and treating peripheral vascular disease.
  • Despite advancements, iodinated agents can cause contrast-induced nephropathy and allergic reactions.
  • Carbon dioxide (CO2) angiography presents a promising alternative for specific patient groups.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate carbon dioxide angiography as an alternative to iodinated contrast agents.
  • To highlight the benefits of CO2 angiography in managing peripheral vascular disease.
  • To inform interventional cardiologists about CO2 angiography techniques and considerations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing digital subtraction angiography to enhance CO2 angiography image quality.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Applying specific techniques for CO2 administration in vascular procedures.
  • Assessing patient populations suitable for CO2 angiography.

    • Main Results:

    • Digital subtraction angiography significantly improves image quality for CO2 angiography.
    • CO2 angiography effectively visualizes peripheral vasculature, aiding diagnosis and treatment.
    • Understanding CO2 properties is key to successful application.

    Conclusions:

    • Carbon dioxide angiography is a viable alternative to iodinated contrast agents for peripheral vascular disease.
    • Improved imaging technology enhances the utility of CO2 angiography.
    • Knowledge of CO2's unique characteristics enables broader application in interventional cardiology.