Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Assessment of clinically significant changes in acute pain in children
Blake Bulloch1, Milton Tenenbein
1Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Children's Hospital, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. bulloch@mb.sympatico.ca
Insights
Determining clinically significant pain reduction in children is crucial for effective pediatric emergency care. A small change on pain scales like the Color Analogue Scale (CAS) or Faces Pain Scale (FPS) indicates improvement.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Emergency Medicine
- Pain Management
- Clinical Assessment
Background:
- Effective pain assessment and management are vital in pediatric emergency departments (EDs).
- Quantifying pain changes is essential for evaluating treatment efficacy in children.
- Existing pain scales need validation for clinically significant improvement thresholds.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the minimal change in pain severity scores on the Color Analogue Scale (CAS) and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) that signifies a clinically significant improvement in pediatric patients.
- To provide benchmarks for assessing pain control effectiveness in the ED setting.
Main Methods:
- Prospective, descriptive study of children aged 5-16 with acute pain in a pediatric ED.
- Exclusion criteria included intoxication, altered sensorium, clinical instability, non-English speaking, and developmental delay.
- Children rated pain using CAS and FPS before and after interventions, reporting perceived change.
Main Results:
- A median CAS change of 2.0 cm and FPS change of 1.0 face indicated pain was "a little less."
- A median CAS change of 4.0 cm and FPS change of 2.0 faces indicated pain was "much less."
- Most children (n=121) experienced pain reduction; worsening pain was rare.
Conclusions:
- This study establishes concrete values for clinically significant pain reduction in children using CAS and FPS.
- Findings offer healthcare professionals and researchers a standardized method to evaluate pain management interventions in pediatric EDs.
- Results enhance the clinical relevance of pain control assessments in pediatric practice.
Objective:
To quantify, using two pain assessment scales, the amount of change in pain severity required to achieve a clinically significant improvement in pain in children presenting to a pediatric emergency department (ED) with pain.
Methods:
Prospective, descriptive study involving all children presenting to a pediatric ED between 5 and 16 years of age inclusive with acute pain. Children were excluded if they 1) were intoxicated or had altered sensorium, 2) were clinically unstable, 3) were non-English-speaking, or 4) were developmentally delayed. Written informed consent was obtained. Children were asked to mark their current pain severity on the standardized Color Analogue Scale (CAS) and Faces Pain Scale (FPS). After each pain control intervention the child was asked to repeat these measurements and to describe whether his or her pain was "much less," "a little less," "about the same," "a little worse," or "much worse" compared with before. This process was repeated until the child was discharged from the ED or had a score of zero. The main outcome measure was the smallest change on the CAS or FPS necessary to cause the child to describe his or her pain as a "little less." This was defined as the clinically significant change in pain. The "ideal" change in pain was defined as the amount of change necessary for the child to describe the pain as "much less" or at which point the child thought he or she no longer required any medicine to help the pain go away.
Results:
One hundred twenty-one children were enrolled with a mean age of 9.8 years (SD +/- 3.15). Males accounted for 56%. Pain was traumatic in 65% and nontraumatic in 35%. A total of 153 pain comparisons were made using the CAS and 154 using the FPS. Only three children complained that their pain got worse (two a little worse and one much worse). Pain was described as "the same" in 20. Of the 60 pain comparisons judged to be a "little less," the CAS score changed by a median of 2.0 cm [interquartile ratio (IQR) 1-3], and the FPS by 1.0 face (IQR 1-2). In the 71 children who judged their pain to be "much less," the CAS decreased by a median of 4.0 cm (IQR 2-5) and the FPS by 2.0 faces (IQR 2-3).
Conclusions:
The assessment and treatment of pain in children are an important component of pediatric practice, especially in the ED. This study provides health care professionals and clinical investigators the information necessary to assess whether their method of pain control in children is clinically relevant.
More Related Videos
07:14A Quantitative Sensory Testing Paradigm to Obtain Measures of Pain Processing in Patients Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery
Published on: January 18, 2018
06:04Objective Nociceptive Assessment in Ventilated ICU Patients: A Feasibility Study Using Pupillometry and the Nociceptive Flexion Reflex
Published on: July 4, 2018