Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Errors in methodology (conclusion). XXXIX. The ultimate truth].

F R Rosendaal1, L M Bouter

  • 1Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum, afd. Klinische Epidemiologie, Postbus 9600, 2300 RC Leiden. f.r.rosendaal@lumc.nl

Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Geneeskunde
|March 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Brave real world.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016
Same author

Fatty acid intake and its dietary sources in relation with markers of type 2 diabetes risk: The NEO study.

European journal of clinical nutrition·2016
Same author

Cross-sectional association of endogenous steroid hormone, sex hormone-binding globulin, and precursor steroid levels with hemostatic factor levels in postmenopausal women.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016
Same author

Causes of venous thrombosis.

Thrombosis journal·2016
Same author

The transcendental scientist.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016
Same author

Going abroad.

Journal of thrombosis and haemostasis : JTH·2016

Methodological flaws in studies don't always prevent correct conclusions, and well-designed studies may still err. Expert opinions diverge due to study interpretations and inherent uncertainties.

Area of Science:

  • Methodology and Scientific Reasoning
  • Epistemology in Research

Context:

  • Acknowledges that research quality varies, with potential for bias or chance influencing outcomes.
  • Highlights the inherent complexities in scientific interpretation and the pursuit of definitive truth.

Purpose:

  • To explore the relationship between study quality, methodological limitations, and the validity of research conclusions.
  • To explain how differing interpretations and inherent uncertainties can lead to divergent expert opinions.

Summary:

  • Methodological shortcomings do not invariably invalidate study conclusions; minor biases or irrelevant flaws may permit correct findings.
  • Conversely, perfectly executed studies can yield incorrect results due to random chance, such as incomparable groups.
  • Bayes' theorem provides a framework for understanding how experts can reach opposing conclusions from identical data.

Related Experiment Videos

Impact:

  • Underscores the nuanced nature of scientific evidence and the importance of critical appraisal beyond simple quality metrics.
  • Emphasizes that the ultimate scientific truth is often elusive, requiring ongoing investigation and interpretation.