Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

What triggers catch-up saccades during visual tracking?

Sophie de Brouwer1, Demet Yuksel, Gunnar Blohm

  • 1Centre for Systems Engineering and Applied Mechanics, Université Catholique de Louvain, 4 av. G. Lemaître, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.

Journal of Neurophysiology
|March 6, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Scientists discovered that the brain predicts "eye crossing time" to decide between smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements during visual tracking. This finding clarifies how the central nervous system (CNS) switches eye movement strategies.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Effect of Risks, Consequences, and Gravitational Priors on Sensorimotor Coordination: Insights from Weightlessness.

The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience·2026
Same author

Improvement in Tics and Motor Impulsivity Is Associated With Functional and Receptor-Enriched Connectivity Changes in Adolescents With Tourette Disorder.

Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging·2026
Same author

Implementation of large language models in electronic health records.

PLOS digital health·2025
Same author

3-D Reconstruction of Fingertip Deformation During Contact Initiation.

Multisensory research·2025
Same author

What Is the Difference between an Impulsive and a Timed Anticipatory Movement?

eNeuro·2025
Same author

Interference between Flexible and Adaptive Reaching Control.

eNeuro·2025

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Oculomotor control
  • Human physiology

Background:

  • Primates use smooth pursuit and saccades for visual tracking of moving objects.
  • The decision-making process for switching between these eye movements is not well understood.
  • Understanding this switch is crucial for comprehending how the central nervous system (CNS) integrates control strategies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate human oculomotor responses to varying position and velocity errors during visual tracking.
  • To identify the criterion used by the oculomotor system to switch between smooth pursuit and saccadic eye movements.

Main Methods:

  • Experimentally manipulated combinations of position and velocity errors during visual tracking tasks in humans.
  • Recorded and analyzed oculomotor responses, specifically eye movements.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • The oculomotor system predicts the "eye crossing time" (T(XE)), the projected time of eye-target trajectory intersection.
  • A T(XE) between 40 and 180 ms results in smooth pursuit without saccades.
  • Saccades are triggered when T(XE) falls outside this range ( < 40 ms or > 180 ms), with a latency of approximately 125 ms.

Conclusions:

  • Eye crossing time (T(XE)) serves as the critical decision-making parameter for switching between smooth pursuit and catch-up saccades.
  • This predictive mechanism highlights a sophisticated strategy employed by the CNS for efficient visual tracking.
  • The findings provide insights into the neural control of combined eye movement strategies.