Related Experiment Videos
Dealing with the prenatal diagnosis of clefting: a parent's perspective
1University of Washington School of Social Work, Seattle, Washington, USA. caspin@chmc.org.
Insights
Prenatal testing offers valuable information but presents challenges in care standards and access. This evaluation explores parental and professional viewpoints on uncertainty and reassurance during prenatal diagnosis.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
- Bioethics
Background:
- Increasing availability of prenatal testing for diverse indications.
- Conflicting standards of care and access issues in prenatal evaluation.
- Dynamic landscape of prenatal screening necessitates updated approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- Evaluate issues of uncertainty and reassurance in prenatal testing.
- Examine prenatal testing from professional and parental perspectives.
- Describe personal experiences with prenatal diagnosis of a cleft.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative analysis of professional and parental viewpoints.
- Review of current prenatal testing standards and access.
- Case study of prenatal cleft diagnosis impact.
Main Results:
- Identified significant confusion regarding prenatal testing access and standards.
- Highlighted emotional impact of prenatal diagnosis on families.
- Described challenges in balancing full disclosure with patient comprehension.
Conclusions:
- Questioned motivations behind current prenatal testing practices.
- Suggested improved support strategies for families undergoing prenatal testing.
- Advocated for enhanced pre-examination discussions on managing unexpected findings and informed consent.
Objectives:
Prenatal testing and information is available on an increasing basis for a variety of reasons. There are conflicting standards of care in the delivery of this type of evaluation and even more confusion around access to such services. As physicians and patients evaluate which tests will generate useful information with acceptable levels of risk, the rules of the game constantly shift. Presenting the situation from the viewpoints of both a professional and a parent, issues revolving around uncertainty and reassurance are evaluated. A description of the personal experience of the impact of the discovery of a cleft prenatally is provided.
Conclusions:
Finally, efforts are made to raise questions about our motivations behind conducting prenatal testing and also developing some suggestions about how to support families better in our regular clinical work. A challenge is made to providers and patients to do more work prior to examination to explore how the unexpected will be handled. The dilemma about how to facilitate informed consent through full disclosure without overwhelming the patient is also discussed.