Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reporting participation in case-control studies.

Sara H Olson1, Lynda F Voigt, Colin B Begg

  • 1Department of Epidemiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA. olsons@mskcc.org

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)
|March 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tumor miRNA Signatures Associate with Outcomes of Patients with Stage II/III Melanoma.

Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research·2025
Same author

Two-stage subsampling variable selection for sparse high-dimensional generalized linear models.

Statistical methods in medical research·2025
Same author

A New Strategy for Evaluating the Impact of Epidemiologic Risk Factors for Cancer With Application to Melanoma.

Journal of the American Statistical Association·2025
Same author

Association of Inherited Genetic Variants with Multiple Primary Melanoma.

Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology·2025
Same author

Sex differences in melanoma survival-a GEM study.

JNCI cancer spectrum·2025
Same author

Improving Accuracy of Somatic Mutation Profiling in Large Epidemiologic Studies: Addressing Cases without Matched Normal Samples.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2024
Same journal

Temporal Connectivity of Social Contact Networks in Urban and Rural India.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Indoor Radon Concentrations and Hematologic Traits in the Women's Health Initiative.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Non-random selection with and without bias due to selecting on an exposure.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
See all related articles

Standardizing how case-control studies report participant recruitment is crucial for assessing study validity. Consistent reporting of control subject recruitment and outcomes will improve nonresponse evaluation across research.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Low participation in case-control studies can compromise their validity.
  • Inconsistent reporting of subject participation hinders nonresponse evaluation across studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a standardized method for reporting control subject recruitment processes and outcomes in case-control studies.
  • To enhance the evaluation of nonresponse and improve the assessment of study validity.

Main Methods:

  • Authors should describe the sampling frame, selection methods, and number of units selected.
  • Report recruitment outcomes categorized as: ineligible, eligibility undetermined, respondent not eligible, or respondent eligible.
  • Provide specific details based on recruitment methods (e.g., random-digit dialing, in-person, mail).

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Standardized reporting will enable evaluation of different recruitment strategies.
  • Consistent data will allow for better assessment of the success of participant recruitment.
  • Separate reporting for different control sources or specimen collection is recommended.

Conclusions:

  • Standardized reporting of recruitment processes and outcomes is essential for case-control study validity.
  • This approach will facilitate consistent nonresponse evaluation and improve research quality.
  • Consistent reporting enhances the ability to assess the validity of epidemiological research.