Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimates revisited.

Michael P Epstein1, Xihong Lin, Michael Boehnke

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, 1420 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-2029, USA.

American Journal of Human Genetics
|March 7, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Human germline biallelic loss-of-function <i>OSMR</i> variants cause severe allergic disease.

Journal of human immunity·2026
Same author

Genomic analyses implicate hormonal and metabolic dysregulation in polycystic ovary syndrome.

Nature genetics·2026
Same author

Discovery of gene-alcohol interaction loci influencing blood pressure in 1.1 million individuals from multiple populations.

Research square·2026
Same author

Plasma metabolite association profiles for type 2 diabetes genetic clusters in Finnish men.

Diabetologia·2026
Same author

Donor-matched iPSC model reveals context-dependent T2D genetic signals in fibro-adipogenic progenitors.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

A resource of "bottom-line" variant associations for 1,281 complex traits by integrating data across published genome-wide association studies.

Research square·2026
Same journal

Comparison of methods for assessing effects of risk factors on disease progression in Mendelian randomization under index event bias.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Deciding "what" to screen for and "when": The importance of natural history information.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Homologous recombination deficiency-driven genomic instability in ovarian cancer as an indicator of BRCA1 and BRCA2 variant pathogenicity.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Individuals who deviate from polygenic expectation are enriched for damaging variants in genes linked to rare disease.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

Integrating social determinants of health and genetic risk in disease risk models.

American journal of human genetics·2026
Same journal

De novo variants in LDB1 are linked to distinct neurodevelopmental phenotypes determined by variant location and differing pathomechanisms.

American journal of human genetics·2026
See all related articles

Standard genetic analysis adjustments may bias population estimates if parameter heterogeneity is unmodeled. Correctly modeling ascertainment schemes and data ensures accurate population-based parameter estimates in genetic studies.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Population Genetics

Background:

  • Ascertainment-adjusted parameter estimates in genetic analyses are typically assumed to represent original population values.
  • Unmodeled parameter heterogeneity can lead to biased estimates, affecting complex genetic studies.
  • Burton et al. (2000) highlighted that unmodeled heterogeneity causes ascertainment-adjusted estimates to reflect subpopulation values.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the impact of ascertainment adjustment in genetic analyses.
  • To demonstrate the conditions under which ascertainment adjustment yields accurate population-based parameter estimates.
  • To clarify the implications of unmodeled ascertainment schemes and data characteristics on parameter estimation.

Main Methods:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Revisiting and analyzing examples previously used to illustrate ascertainment adjustment.
  • Applying rigorous statistical modeling to ascertainment schemes and genetic data.
  • Comparing parameter estimates derived from correctly modeled versus improperly modeled ascertainment.

    • Main Results:

    • Correctly modeling the ascertainment scheme and data nature allows ascertainment-adjusted analyses to yield accurate population-based parameter estimates.
    • Improperly modeled ascertainment schemes or data result in estimates that do not accurately reflect either the original population or the ascertained subpopulation.
    • The accuracy of parameter estimates is contingent upon the appropriate statistical modeling of the ascertainment process.

    Conclusions:

    • Accurate population-based parameter estimates are achievable through appropriate statistical modeling of ascertainment in genetic studies.
    • Failure to properly model ascertainment schemes and data can lead to misleading genetic parameter estimates.
    • This study underscores the critical importance of robust statistical methodology in genetic data analysis to avoid biased inferences.