Related Experiment Videos
Routine follow-up after periradicular operations: current practice in UK hospitals
R J Oliver1, K Mavrakis, T Macfarlane
1Clinical Academic Group of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, Turner Dental School, Manchester, UK. richard.j.oliver@man.ac.uk
Abstract:
Questionnaires were circulated to all Fellows of the British Society of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons in 1999, 75% of whom replied (n = 194). There was a wide range of responses for both the timing of review appointments and the taking of radiographs. Most patients were first followed up 1 week after operation (46%), but 38% were reviewed in the second week. Five surgeons did not review patients at all and two did not review until 6 or 9 months, respectively. Nearly two-thirds routinely offered a second follow-up appointment but only 14% offered more than two, the maximum being seven. Most arranged postoperative radio-graphs but the timing ranged from immediately postoperatively to 1 year after the procedure. Less than one-third requested a second postoperative radiograph between 1 month and 1 year. The largest disparity was in the time of discharge to the general dental practitioner, which ranged from immediately to 5 years, the most popular time of discharge being at 3 months. The wide variations may reflect unnecessary recall of patients and misuse of valuable clinical time.