Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

In Vitro Evaluation of the Potentiating Effects of Plant-Derived Molecules on Conventional Biocides
Published on: May 8, 2026
[Effectiveness of contact isolation in the control of multiresistant bacteria in an intensive care service]
Francisco Alvarez-Lerma1, Montserrat Gasulla Guillermo, Victoria Abad Peruga
1Servicio de Medicina Intensiva, Hospital del Mar, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Spain. FAlvarez@imas.imim.es
Aim:
To describe the frequency, characteristics and progression of critically ill patients admitted to the ICU, for whom isolation is indicated due to detection of multiresistant pathogenic bacteria, and to study the effectiveness of precautionary measures to avoid dissemination of these microorganisms.
Patients And Methods:
Prospective, observational, cohort study performed by a specially created working group of four nurses and an ICU specialist. The study included 55 patients in whom contact isolation was indicated (isolation rate, 15.2 per 100 patients), collected over a 16-month period.
Results:
The multiresistant bacteria responsible for isolation of the patients were: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (17 cases), Staphylococcus aureus (17 cases), Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (15 cases), Acinetobacter baumannii (4 cases) and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)- producing Enterobacteria (2 cases). Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. was not identified in any case. The mean duration of ICU isolation was 17.6 6 5.1 days (range 1-75). Multiresistant bacteria were classified as intra-ICU nosocomial in 39 cases (70.9%), extra-ICU nosocomial in 10 cases (18.2%) and community-acquired in 6 (10.9%). During the study period, no epidemic outbreak due to any of the controlled bacteria was detected. The multiresistant bacteria presented in the form of colonization in 41 cases (74.5%). The reasons for discontinuing isolation were death of the patient in 18 cases, transferal to a hospital ward (discharge from the ICU) in 19 cases, and eradication of the bacteria in 18 cases. Of the 55 patients with multiresistant bacteria, 35 (63.6%) died during hospitalization, and 23 of these (41.8%) during their stay in the ICU.
Conclusions:
The implementation of a working team for early detection of multiresistant pathogenic bacteria resulted in application of contact isolation in 15.2% of patients admitted. Surveillance to fulfill isolation precautions in a medical-surgical ICU achieved an absence of epidemic outbreaks due to these bacteria during the study period.
Insights
A dedicated team successfully implemented contact isolation for 15.2% of ICU patients due to multiresistant bacteria, preventing epidemic outbreaks. This surveillance strategy effectively controlled the spread of dangerous pathogens in the intensive care unit.
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Critical Care Medicine
- Microbiology
Context:
- Critically ill patients in Intensive Care Units (ICUs) are at high risk for infections caused by multiresistant pathogenic bacteria.
- Early detection and isolation are crucial to prevent the dissemination of these microorganisms within healthcare settings.
Purpose:
- To determine the incidence, characteristics, and progression of multiresistant bacterial infections in ICU patients requiring isolation.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of implemented precautionary measures in preventing the spread of these pathogens.
Summary:
- A prospective, observational cohort study involving 55 patients identified Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia as the most common multiresistant bacteria.
- The mean duration of ICU isolation was 17.6 days, with most infections being nosocomial (70.9% intra-ICU).
- Despite a high mortality rate among affected patients (63.6%), the surveillance and isolation protocol successfully prevented epidemic outbreaks during the 16-month study period.
Impact:
- The study highlights the significant burden of multiresistant bacteria in ICUs and the effectiveness of a proactive surveillance and isolation strategy.
- Implementation of a specialized working team for early detection and isolation of multiresistant bacteria is associated with successful containment and prevention of outbreaks.
Related Concept Videos
Transmission-based Precautions II: Airborne and Protective Environment
Airborne precautions:
Use airborne precautions when treating patients known or suspected to have diseases that spread through the air—for example, tuberculosis or measles. These organisms are present in smaller droplets expelled by an infected person and...
Healthcare Associated Infections II: Preventive Measures
The best practices for preventing healthcare-associated infections include hand hygiene, patient risk...
Transmission-based Precautions I: Contact, Enteric, and Droplets
Contact Precautions:
Contact precautions are the measures taken to prevent the transmission of infectious agents, especially epidemiologically important microorganisms such as MRSA or influenza, primarily transmitted through direct or indirect contact with an...
Hand hygiene
Hand washing...
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Clinical Significance of Antibiotic Resistance
