Related Experiment Videos
Zoom endoscopic evaluation of rejection in living-related small bowel transplantation
Takashi Sasaki1, Toshimichi Hasegawa, Hiroshi Nakai
1Departments of Pediatric Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan.
Background:
This study evaluated zoom endoscopic findings according to four components in comparison with the histologic findings of acute cellular rejection (ACR) in a living-related small bowel transplantation (SBTx) patient.
Methods:
A 16-year-old boy with microvillus inclusion disease underwent SBTx with a 150-cm-long ileal graft from a blood-identical living-related donor. The endoscope was inserted into the distal stoma of the graft, and the mucosal architecture was observed under zoom. The observed findings were expressed by the following four components and graded as 0 to 2: H, homogeneity of mucosal change, minimal (H-0), patchy (H-1), diffuse (H-2); V, appearance of villi, stringlike (V-0), tonguelike (V-1), domelike (V-2); W, widening of crypt area, narrow (W-0), slightly widened within a width of one villus (W-1), markedly widened beyond a width of one villus (W-2); E, erythema in crypt area: no redness (E-0), sporadic erythema (E-1), diffuse erythema (E-2).
Results:
Histologic ACR was grade 0 in 27, grade 1 in 6, grade 2 in 3, and grade 3 in 0 occasions during 11 months after SBTx. In grade 0, 1, and 2 histology, H-0/H-1/H-2 was 85.2%/14.8%/0%, 33.3%/66.7%/0%, and 0%/100%/0%, respectively, with a significant difference among the groups by grade (P<0.05). V-0/V-1/V-2 was 48.1%/51.9%/0%, 0%/100%/0%, and 0%/66.7%/33.3% (P<0.05), W-0/W-1/W-2 was 85.2%/14.8%/0%, 0%/100%/0%, and 0%/66.7%/33.3% (P<0.05), and E-0/E-1/E-2 was 100%/0%/0%, 66.7%/33.3%/0%, and 0%/100%/0% (P<0.05), respectively.
Conclusion:
Zoom endoscopic findings, graded on four components, may reflect the histologic severity of ACR and minimize the performance of biopsies in SBTx.
Insights
Zoom endoscopy effectively assesses acute cellular rejection (ACR) in small bowel transplantation (SBTx) patients. Its four-component grading system correlates with histologic findings, potentially reducing the need for biopsies.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Transplant Surgery
- Endoscopic Imaging
Background:
- Acute cellular rejection (ACR) is a critical complication following small bowel transplantation (SBTx).
- Histologic examination is the gold standard for diagnosing ACR, often requiring invasive biopsies.
- Novel endoscopic techniques are needed to non-invasively monitor graft health post-SBTx.
Observation:
- A 16-year-old patient with microvillus inclusion disease underwent SBTx.
- Zoom endoscopy was used to evaluate the mucosal architecture of the ileal graft.
- Findings were graded based on mucosal homogeneity, villi appearance, crypt widening, and erythema.
Findings:
- Zoom endoscopic findings showed significant correlations with histologic ACR grades (P<0.05).
- Specific patterns in mucosal homogeneity, villi morphology, crypt widening, and erythema distinguished different levels of ACR.
- The grading system demonstrated sensitivity in differentiating between ACR grades 0, 1, and 2.
Implications:
- Zoom endoscopy offers a promising tool for real-time assessment of ACR in SBTx.
- This technique may help minimize the frequency of endoscopic biopsies, reducing patient risk and healthcare costs.
- Further validation in larger cohorts could establish zoom endoscopy as a standard monitoring method in SBTx.