Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Interval estimation for a difference between intraclass kappa statistics.

Allan Donner1, Guangyong Zou

  • 1Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. donner@biostats.uwo.ca

Biometrics
|March 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Definition, analysis, reporting, and interpretation of perioperative bleeding in randomized controlled trials: a methodological systematic review.

Perioperative medicine (London, England)·2026
Same author

A gender-sensitized lifestyle intervention powered by sport fandom in men with overweight or obesity: a 1-year cost-effectiveness analysis of the Hockey FIT Trial.

International journal of obesity (2005)·2026
Same author

The UCEIS and UC-100 score were responsive endoscopic and global indices in a phase 2 trial of ulcerative colitis.

Crohn's & colitis 360·2026
Same author

A rank-based approach to randomized controlled trials with multiple co-primary endpoints of different scales.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

An Enhanced Treatment Algorithm Targeting Mucosal Healing Is Effective and Safe in Older Patients With Crohn's Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of the REACT2 Trial.

The American journal of gastroenterology·2026
Same author

Confidence interval estimation for the win probability in cluster randomized trials with hierarchical composite endpoints using win fractions.

Clinical trials (London, England)·2026
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces two new methods for creating confidence intervals for the difference between independent kappa statistics, even with small sample sizes. These methods are validated for sample sizes as low as 25 subjects per group.

Area of Science:

  • Statistics
  • Biostatistics
  • Psychometrics

Background:

  • Kappa statistic is widely used for interrater reliability.
  • Existing methods for confidence intervals of kappa differences are limited, especially for small to moderate sample sizes.
  • There is a need for reliable statistical methods to assess agreement between independent raters.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose and evaluate novel methods for constructing confidence intervals for the difference between independent kappa statistics.
  • To provide statistically valid methods applicable to small and moderate sample sizes.
  • To determine sample size requirements for achieving desired confidence interval precision.

Main Methods:

  • The study adapted Newcombe's (1998) method for confidence intervals of independent proportions.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Two new model-based inference procedures were developed and evaluated.
  • Performance was assessed using simulations and comparisons with existing approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed methods demonstrated satisfactory performance in sample sizes as small as 25 subjects per group.
    • The methods provide valid confidence intervals for the difference between independent kappa statistics.
    • Sample size guidelines were established to achieve specific confidence interval widths.

    Conclusions:

    • The developed methods offer a reliable approach for confidence interval construction for differences in kappa statistics.
    • These methods are particularly valuable for studies with limited sample sizes.
    • The findings contribute to more accurate statistical inference in reliability studies.