Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Principal stratification in causal inference.

Constantine E Frangakis1, Donald B Rubin

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21205, USA. cfrangak@jhsph.edu

Biometrics
|March 14, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Baseline Functional Connectivity Predicts Who Will Benefit From Neuromodulation: Evidence From Primary Progressive Aphasia.

Neurorehabilitation and neural repair·2026
Same author

Verbal learning in logopenic variant Primary Progressive Aphasia: An EEG investigation.

Neurobiology of aging·2025
Same author

Diffuse Axonal and Vascular Pathology in the Gyrencephalic Brain after High-Energy Blunt Injury: Clinicopathological Correlations Involving the Brainstem.

Journal of neurotrauma·2024
Same author

Baseline functional connectivity predicts who will benefit from neuromodulation: evidence from primary progressive aphasia.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2024
Same author

Contrast-specific propensity scores for causal inference with multiple interventions.

Statistical methods in medical research·2024
Same author

Long-Term Changes in Axon Calibers after Injury: Observations on the Mouse Corticospinal Tract.

International journal of molecular sciences·2022
Same journal

Fast penalized generalized estimating equations for large longitudinal functional datasets.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Causally-interpretable random-effects meta-analysis.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Statistical inference for mean function of partially observed functional time series.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Subgroup identification via Interaction Tree and Mixed Model for Repeated Measures with application to Alzheimer's disease.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Finite mixtures of linear quantile regressions with concomitant variables: a solution to endogeneity in longitudinal data modeling.

Biometrics·2026
Same journal

Discussion on "INTACT: a method for integration of longitudinal physical activity data from multiple sources" by Jingru Zhang, Erjia Cui, Hongzhe Li, and Haochang Shou.

Biometrics·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces principal stratification to compare treatments using posttreatment variables, ensuring causal effects are accurately estimated. This new framework overcomes limitations of standard methods for analyzing complex treatment outcomes.

Area of Science:

  • Causal inference
  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology

Background:

  • Standard treatment comparison methods adjusted for posttreatment variables often yield non-causal effects.
  • Accurate causal effect estimation is crucial for reliable scientific conclusions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Propose a general framework for comparing treatments adjusting for posttreatment variables.
  • Define principal effects based on principal stratification for accurate causal inference.
  • Address limitations in current methods for handling noncompliance, missing data, and surrogate endpoints.

Main Methods:

  • Introduce principal stratification, a cross-classification of subjects based on potential posttreatment variable values under each treatment.
  • Define principal effects as causal effects within a principal stratum.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Apply principal causal effects to analyze treatment noncompliance, missing outcomes, and surrogate endpoints.

    • Main Results:

    • Principal strata are unaffected by treatment assignment, allowing their use as covariates.
    • Principal effects are demonstrated to be true causal effects, avoiding complications of standard adjusted estimands.
    • Current definitions of surrogacy may not accurately represent causal effects of treatment on outcome.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed framework provides a robust method for causal inference with posttreatment variables.
    • Principal causal effects offer a superior approach for analyzing complex treatment scenarios, including surrogacy.
    • The framework clarifies the link between principal causal effects and existing methods for noncompliance, missing data, and censoring.