Local Anesthetics: Common Agents and Their Applications
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Spinal Anesthesia
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
General Anesthesia: Overview
Parenteral Anesthetics: Overview
Inhalational Anesthetics: Overview
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Guidelines for Elective Pediatric Fiberoptic Intubation
Published on: January 18, 2011
Allison Kinder Ross1, John B Eck
1Division of Pediatric Anesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
This article examines the expanding role of office-based anesthesia for children, highlighting the importance of safety, patient outcomes, and professional organization in ensuring successful clinical practices outside traditional hospital settings.
Area of Science:
Background:
The transition of pediatric surgical procedures into non-hospital environments remains a significant shift in modern medical practice. No prior work had resolved the full scope of safety requirements for these settings. Prior research has shown that professional organizations are increasingly necessary to standardize care protocols. That uncertainty drove the development of specialized groups dedicated to clinical excellence. It was already known that financial incentives and convenience drive the adoption of these models. This gap motivated a closer look at how anesthesia providers maintain high standards. The current landscape lacks comprehensive data on long-term outcomes for pediatric patients. Researchers now focus on balancing operational efficiency with rigorous safety benchmarks.
Purpose Of The Study:
The aim of this study is to evaluate the evolving landscape of office-based anesthesia for pediatric patients. This research addresses the challenges of maintaining high safety standards outside traditional hospital settings. The authors seek to clarify the role of professional organizations in guiding clinical practice. This investigation explores the motivations behind the shift toward ambulatory surgical environments. The study addresses the need for clear guidelines to ensure patient safety and satisfaction. The researchers intend to provide a reference for physicians considering a transition to office-based models. This work examines the balance between financial incentives and the quality of care. The authors aim to define the necessary goals for successful pediatric anesthesia in the office.
Main Methods:
The review approach synthesizes current trends regarding the expansion of ambulatory surgical environments. Investigators analyzed the organizational structure of professional groups dedicated to clinical safety. This assessment involved evaluating the utility of digital platforms for professional communication. The authors examined the primary motivations driving the shift toward non-hospital settings. This review approach focused on identifying the core requirements for successful pediatric outcomes. Researchers compared the benefits of convenience against the necessity of maintaining rigorous safety standards. The study utilized existing literature to define the role of anesthesia providers in office organization. This systematic overview highlights the strategies used to promote safe practice in these settings.
Main Results:
The literature indicates that the use of office-based surgery and anesthesia is experiencing continuous growth. Key findings from the literature suggest that professional groups are becoming a driving force for safety. The data show that financial incentives act as a primary motivator for surgeons and facilities. The review identifies that patient and surgeon convenience represents a significant advantage of this model. The findings highlight that safety must be the paramount concern for providers. The literature suggests that the Society for Office-Based Anesthesia serves as a critical resource for practitioners. The findings indicate that minor procedures are increasingly suitable for these environments. The review confirms that ongoing organizational efforts are essential for maintaining effective care.
Conclusions:
The authors suggest that professional societies serve as a primary mechanism for improving pediatric safety standards. They propose that future success depends on maintaining a focus on family and surgeon satisfaction. The researchers indicate that office-based models represent a viable alternative for minor pediatric procedures. They emphasize that anesthesia providers must remain active in organizing the clinical environment. The text highlights that safety must remain the paramount goal for all practitioners. The authors conclude that ongoing efforts to measure and improve care quality are necessary. They suggest that continued growth in this field requires constant vigilance regarding patient outcomes. The study implies that the transition to office settings can be both safe and effective when managed correctly.
The authors propose that success relies on prioritizing patient safety, verifying improved clinical outcomes, and ensuring high levels of satisfaction for both families and surgeons. This approach contrasts with traditional hospital-based models that often prioritize institutional throughput over individual patient convenience.
The Society for Office-Based Anesthesia provides a digital platform for clinicians to engage in online discussions. This resource serves as a reference for physicians evaluating the feasibility of transitioning their practices to non-hospital settings.
Anesthesia providers must take active roles in organizing the office environment to ensure safety. This necessity arises because the clinical setting lacks the infrastructure of a hospital, requiring providers to manage safety protocols directly.
The website functions as a central repository for professional collaboration and information sharing. This digital tool facilitates widespread participation among practitioners aiming to standardize safety practices across different office locations.
The authors identify financial incentives and increased convenience for patients and surgeons as the main drivers for this trend. These factors differ from clinical motivations, which focus primarily on patient safety and procedural outcomes.
The researchers suggest that future efforts should focus on developing new methods to study and enhance the quality of care. This implication highlights the need for ongoing evaluation as the practice becomes more common.