Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relationship between skill and outcome in the laboratory-based model.

Vivek Datta1, Mirren Mandalia, Sean Mackay

  • 1Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, Imperial College School of Medicine at St Mary's, and the Regional Vascular Unit, St Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

Surgery
|March 15, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Objective measures of manual dexterity significantly correlate with surgical procedure outcomes in a simulated setting. Better manual dexterity predicts fewer leaks and larger anastomoses, indicating surgical skill can be quantitatively assessed.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Identifying quality markers and improvement measures for ward-based surgical care: a semistructured interview study.

American journal of surgery·2015
Same author

Using preoperative imaging for intraoperative guidance: a case of mistaken identity.

The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS·2015
Same author

The quality narrative in health care.

Lancet (London, England)·2015
Same author

The endoscopy evolution: 'the superscope era'.

Frontline gastroenterology·2015
Same author

A wearable mobility assessment device for total knee replacement: A longitudinal feasibility study.

International journal of surgery (London, England)·2015
Same author

A national incident reporting and learning system in England and Wales, but at what cost?

Expert review of pharmacoeconomics & outcomes research·2015

Area of Science:

  • Surgical Skill Assessment
  • Medical Simulation
  • Quantitative Analysis

Background:

  • Developing quantitative assessments for surgical skill is a recent focus.
  • This study investigates the impact of objectively measured manual dexterity on simulated surgical procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine if objective manual dexterity measurements correlate with surgical procedure outcomes.
  • To assess the predictive value of manual dexterity in simulated surgical tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Six general surgical trainees performed standardized polytetrafluoroethylene graft to artery anastomoses on a vascular model.
  • Manual dexterity was measured using electromagnetic motion analysis and a 4-parameter evaluation of the final product.
  • Outcomes assessed included anastomotic leakage rate and smallest cross-sectional area.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Objective manual dexterity measures showed a significant correlation (Pearson coefficient, 0.423; P <.02).
  • Improved manual dexterity scores correlated with better outcomes: less leakage (Pearson coefficient, 0.514; P <.01) and larger anastomotic cross-sectional area (Pearson coefficient, 0.495; P <.01).
  • Procedural time did not significantly influence outcome measures.

Conclusions:

  • A significant correlation exists between objective manual dexterity measures and surgical outcome measures in this model.
  • Objective assessment of manual dexterity can predict surgical procedure outcomes, highlighting its importance in surgical skill evaluation.