Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 10, 2026

Cardiac Pressure-Volume Loop Analysis Using Conductance Catheters in Mice
Published on: September 17, 2015
Reimbursement claims analysis of outcomes with carvedilol and metoprolol
Aileen B Luzier1, Laura A Antell, Li-Ling Chang
1School of Pharmacy, University of Buffalo, NY 14260-1200, USA. luzier@acsu.buffalo.edu
Insights
Carvedilol significantly reduced hospitalizations and total costs in heart failure (HF) patients compared to metoprolol. Despite higher drug expenses, carvedilol offers greater clinical benefits and cost-effectiveness for HF management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacoeconomics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Heart failure (HF) management involves balancing clinical efficacy with healthcare resource utilization.
- Beta-blockers are cornerstone therapies for HF, with differing receptor blockade profiles.
- Understanding the comparative cost-effectiveness of different beta-blockers is crucial for optimizing patient care.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare resource use and associated costs between carvedilol and metoprolol in heart failure patients.
- To evaluate the impact of selective (metoprolol) versus comprehensive (carvedilol) beta-adrenergic blockade on healthcare utilization.
- To determine the overall economic implications of using carvedilol versus metoprolol in HF management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of healthcare claims data from 6 healthcare plans.
- Inclusion of patients diagnosed with HF and treated with either carvedilol or metoprolol for 6 months.
- Utilized a modified Charlson index for comorbidity assessment and logistic regression for hospitalization risk analysis.
Main Results:
- Carvedilol patients showed significantly lower rates of total hospitalizations (36.0% vs. 62.3%) and emergency department visits (23.7% vs. 42.5%) compared to metoprolol patients.
- Carvedilol treatment was associated with a 65% reduction in the risk of any hospitalization (adjusted OR 0.35).
- Despite higher pharmacy costs for carvedilol ($1677 vs. $1322), total healthcare costs were significantly lower ($8100 vs. $14475).
Conclusions:
- Comprehensive adrenergic blockade with carvedilol may offer superior clinical benefits in heart failure patients compared to selective beta-blockade with metoprolol.
- Carvedilol therapy, while associated with increased pharmacy expenditures, leads to reduced overall healthcare costs in HF management.
- These findings support carvedilol as a cost-effective treatment option for heart failure, potentially improving patient outcomes and reducing system burden.
Objective:
To compare resource use and costs in heart failure (HF) patients receiving metoprolol, a selective beta1-receptor blocker, with carvedilol, which blocks beta1-, beta2-, and alpha1-adrenergic receptors, by use of a retrospective reimbursement-claims analysis.
Methods:
Resource use and cost data were extracted for patients diagnosed with HF and treated with carvedilol or metoprolol for 6 months after the initiation of the respective therapy, by use of claims submitted to 6 healthcare plans. A modified Charlson index was used to assess comorbidity. Stepwise logistic regression was used to measure the influence of treatment on hospitalization.
Results:
Claims from 139 carvedilol and 106 metoprolol patients showed that carvedilol patients experienced significantly fewer total hospitalizations (36.0% vs. 62.3%, respectively; p < 0.001) and emergency department visits (23.7% vs. 42.5%, respectively; p = 0.002) and a trend for fewer HF-related (7.9% vs. 14.2%, respectively; NS) and cardiac-related hospitalizations (15.1% vs. 24.5%, respectively; NS). Treatment with carvedilol was associated with a significant decrease in the risk of any hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 0.35, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.63; p <0.001). Higher pharmacy costs (mean $1677 vs. $1322; p <0.001) and lower total costs (mean $8100 vs. $14475; p = 0.025) were observed in carvedilol-treated compared with metoprolol-treated patients, respectively.
Conclusions:
Compared with metoprolol, the more comprehensive adrenergic blockade achieved with carvedilol may translate into greater clinical benefits in patients with HF. Despite higher pharmacy costs, lower total costs were observed in carvedilol-treated patients.
Related Concept Videos
Adrenergic Antagonists: ɑ and β-Receptor Blockers
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
