Risk score for antenatal bacterial vaginosis: BV PIN points
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Multiplex Detection of Bacteria in Complex Clinical and Environmental Samples using Oligonucleotide-coupled Fluorescent Microspheres
Published on: October 23, 2011
Lisa M Pastore1, John M Thorp, Rachel A Royce
1Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27517-9212, USA.
Objective:
Develop a clinical risk score to screen for antenatal bacterial vaginosis (BV), irrespective of symptoms.
Study Design:
Cohort study of 913 pregnant women with last menstrual periods between January 30, 1995 and February 22, 1997. BV was evaluated by Nugent-scored vaginal smears (scores of 7 to 10 considered positive) between 24 and 29 weeks' gestation. Forty-four potential risk factors were assessed.
Results:
17.8% of women had BV, of whom 22% were screened for BV by the usual care provider. Logistic regression-adjusted analyses found six predictors: vaginal pH>4.5 (OR=11.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.8, 17.2]); black race (OR=1.9, 95% CI [1.3, 2.8]); condom use during pregnancy (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]); antenatal BV (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.8]); absence of sperm on smear (OR=1.7, 95% CI [1.0, 2.9]); and no history of sexually transmitted diseases (OR=1.6, 95% CI [1.0, 2.5]). Risk score weights were 5 for an elevated vaginal pH and 1 otherwise. The sensitivity and specificity of screening women with scores > or =4 were both 77%; this would involve screening 33% of patients.
Conclusion:
Approximately 80% of our BV cases were asymptomatic, emphasizing the need for objective risk assessment. Using six factors, clinicians can identify pregnant women at risk for BV.
Related Concept Videos
Microbiota of the Urogenital Tract
Regulation of Bacterial Virulence
Development of the Oral Microbiota
Candidiasis
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Trichomoniasis

