Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

[Atrial fibrillation: always cardioversion? No].

Giuseppe Di Pasquale1, Stefano Biancoli, Biagio Sassone

  • 1Unità Operativa di Cardiologia, Ospedale di Bentivoglio, Azienda USL Bologna Nord, Bentivoglio, BO. g.dipa@libero.it

Italian Heart Journal. Supplement : Official Journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology
|March 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Zero-contrast cardiac resynchronization therapy device implantation in heart failure patients with renal impairment.

Heart rhythm O2·2026
Same author

[Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia: impact factor and impact to readers].

Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006)·2026
Same author

[Presentation].

Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006)·2026
Same author

Anatomical considerations for left bundle branch area pacing.

Heart rhythm·2026
Same author

[Giornale Italiano di Cardiologia and artificial intelligence].

Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006)·2026
Same author

[The non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction network in Italy: still an unmet need].

Giornale italiano di cardiologia (2006)·2026

Managing atrial fibrillation (AF) involves choosing between restoring sinus rhythm or controlling heart rate. Patient factors and AF characteristics guide the decision, with ongoing trials to establish optimal long-term strategies.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Electrophysiology
  • Internal Medicine

Context:

  • Atrial fibrillation (AF) management presents two primary strategies: sinus rhythm restoration with antiarrhythmic drugs versus ventricular rate control with anticoagulation.
  • The efficacy of antiarrhythmic drug prophylaxis is often limited, influencing treatment decisions.

Purpose:

  • To review the factors influencing the choice between sinus rhythm restoration and ventricular rate control in atrial fibrillation management.
  • To guide clinicians in selecting the most appropriate therapeutic strategy based on patient-specific and disease-related parameters.

Summary:

  • Cardioversion for AF should be considered based on the importance of sinus rhythm and maintenance probability, influenced by AF duration, cardiac status, and recurrence history.
  • While initial cardioversion is often warranted, it may be inadvisable in specific patient groups (e.g., elderly, very long AF duration, severe cardiac dysfunction).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Repeated cardioversion is generally indicated for first recurrence but less so for long-standing AF, early recurrences, or if antiarrhythmic prophylaxis fails.

    • Impact:

    • Current evidence does not definitively establish the superior strategy regarding mortality, morbidity, quality of life, or cost-effectiveness.
    • Ongoing large-scale randomized trials are expected to provide crucial data for optimizing atrial fibrillation treatment regimens.