Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Unfocused ergonomics?

A Vitalis1, R Walker, S Legg

  • 1Department of Management, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand. A.Vitalis@massey.ac.nz

Ergonomics
|March 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The application of an industry level participatory ergonomics approach in developing MSD interventions.

Applied ergonomics·2015
Same author

An analysis of sprain and strain injury data for the New Zealand meat processing industry from national and industry injury surveillance databases.

Ergonomics·2008
Same author

The role of contextual factors for musculoskeletal disorders in the New Zealand meat processing industry.

Ergonomics·2008
Same author

Risk characterisation of chemicals in food and diet.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2003
Same author

Cultural differences in emotions: a context for interpreting emotional experiences.

Behaviour research and therapy·2003
Same author

Sirolimus: a single center experience in combination with calcineurin inhibitors.

Transplantation proceedings·2003
Same journal

Identification of systemic barriers, facilitators and adaptations to effective record-keeping: a South African primary healthcare clinic case study.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Layer-specific facial soft-tissue thickness in 1174 Chinese adults: Implications for finite-element headforms and ergonomic design.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

The dual effects of information presentation speed on operator performance in dynamic tasks: a study in supervisory control and data acquisition interfaces.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Evaluating generative AI teaching assistants in simulated learning environments: how instructor type and support type affect students' perceptions.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Swipe smart, not hard: hand health of smartphone users in a university population.

Ergonomics·2026
Same journal

Couriers' work-related musculoskeletal disorders and psychological distress: Insights for work errors and traffic safety.

Ergonomics·2026
See all related articles

Many ergonomists are compromising core principles, becoming overly accommodating to managerial demands. This risks fragmenting the diverse field of ergonomics and diluting its professional identity.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Human Factors Engineering
  • Industrial Psychology

Background:

  • Ergonomics is widely adopted in industrial settings, with managers frequently initiating collaborations with ergonomists.
  • Concerns exist regarding the potential dilution of fundamental ergonomic principles due to industry integration.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To critically evaluate the current state of ergonomics practice within industry.
  • To identify and discuss the risks of principle abandonment and field fragmentation in ergonomics.

Main Methods:

  • Qualitative analysis of industry-ergonomist interactions.
  • Review of established ergonomic principles and contemporary practices.
  • Discussion of the impact of managerial influence on ergonomic application.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Evidence suggests a trend where ergonomists may be compromising core principles to align with managerial expectations.
  • The diverse nature of ergonomics is identified as a contributing factor to its potential fragmentation.
  • A risk of losing professional identity and focus is highlighted due to these trends.

Conclusions:

  • Ergonomists must actively safeguard fundamental principles to maintain the integrity and effectiveness of the field.
  • Addressing the inherent diversity and potential fragmentation is crucial for the future of ergonomics.
  • A call for critical self-reflection within the ergonomics profession is warranted to prevent complacency.