Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Neurophysiological evidence for two processing times for visual object identification.

Haline E Schendan1, Marta Kutas

  • 1Department of Psychology, Boston University, 648 Beacon Street, Boston, MA 02215, USA. schendan@bu.edu

Neuropsychologia
|March 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Late Positive Potentials as an Index of "Desirably Difficult" Learning Processes Engaged During Language Comprehension: ERP Evidence From Studies of Domain Knowledge.

Psychophysiology·2026
Same author

Unveiling Early Signs of Preclinical Alzheimer's Disease Through ERP Analysis with Weighted Visibility Graphs and Ensemble Learning.

Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Memory-related brain potentials for visual objects in early AD show impairment and compensatory mechanisms.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2024
Same author

Flexible Conceptual Representations.

Cognitive science·2024
Same author

Nuances of knowing: Brain potentials reveal implicit effects of domain knowledge on word processing in the absence of sentence-level knowledge.

Psychophysiology·2023
Same author

Comprehending surprising sentences: sensitivity of post-N400 positivities to contextual congruity and semantic relatedness.

Language, cognition and neuroscience·2022
Same journal

Prevalence and modulation of rat off-track head scanning on linear tracks: possible implications for representational and dynamic properties of hippocampal place cells.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Identifying networks within an fMRI multivariate searchlight analysis.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Modulating sentence comprehension in people with aphasia through anodal tDCS: A double-blind randomized cross-over study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Deficient processing of regularity violations during visuospatial neglect: a visual mismatch negativity study.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

Seeing is believing: mental imagery amplifies moral, emotional, and motivational responding to mentally constructed hypothetical events.

Neuropsychologia·2026
Same journal

From past recall to future projection: What does verb tense production reveal about mental time travel in Alzheimer's disease?

Neuropsychologia·2026
See all related articles

Visual object identification occurs faster when object parts are recognizable. Brain activity shows distinct processing pathways depending on how easily object features are recovered from visual input.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Understanding the temporal dynamics of visual object identification is crucial for cognitive neuroscience.
  • Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer a precise measure of neural activity related to cognitive processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the time course of visual object identification using ERPs.
  • To determine how the recoverability of object parts influences the speed of identification and associated neural activity.

Main Methods:

  • Recorded ERPs in young adults viewing fragmented object images.
  • Manipulated image clarity to vary the recoverability of object parts.
  • Analyzed ERP differences between correctly identified and unidentified objects.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Identification time varied significantly with part recoverability, occurring ~200 ms earlier for recoverable parts.
  • Successful identification was associated with increased positivity, evident by ~300 ms (recoverable) or ~550 ms (unrecoverable).
  • Unidentified recoverable objects showed an enhanced frontal negativity (N350), suggesting specific matching operations.

Conclusions:

  • Visual object identification involves distinct processing sequences influenced by feature recoverability.
  • Neural timing of object recognition is flexible, adapting to the quality of visual input.
  • ERPs reveal specific neural signatures for successful identification and object matching processes.