Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hypothesis testing for data from different family study designs.

Susan R Wilson1

  • 1Centre for Mathematics and its Applications and Centre for Bioinformation Science, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia. Sue.Wilson@anu.edu.au

Human Heredity
|March 20, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Integrative Genomics Identifies the Molecular Basis of Resistance to Azacitidine Therapy in Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

Cell reports·2017
Same author

Quantitative Performance Evaluator for Proteomics (QPEP): Web-based Application for Reproducible Evaluation of Proteomics Preprocessing Methods.

Journal of proteome research·2017
Same author

Comparison and visualisation of agreement for paired lists of rankings.

Statistical applications in genetics and molecular biology·2017
Same author

Estimation of the methylation pattern distribution from deep sequencing data.

BMC bioinformatics·2015
Same author

Error estimates for the analysis of differential expression from RNA-seq count data.

PeerJ·2014
Same author

Mass spectrometry-based protein identification by integrating de novo sequencing with database searching.

BMC bioinformatics·2013
Same journal

Comparative profiles of pediatric Mendeliome: A Single-Centre 572-Whole-Exome Sequencing Study in Xinjiang.

Human heredity·2026
Same journal

Erratum.

Human heredity·2026
Same journal

Exploratory Analysis of HMGB1 Genetic Variants and Their Potential Association with Lung Cancer Susceptibility and Chemotherapy Response in a Chinese Population.

Human heredity·2025
Same journal

Weighted Burden Analysis of Rare Genetic Variants Identifies Novel Genes with Effects on BMI.

Human heredity·2025
Same journal

Generalized Stable Population and Agent-Based Models of Phenotypic Transmission in Human Populations, with an Application to Body Size.

Human heredity·2025
Same journal

Proteinase-activated receptor 2 (PAR-2) expression and F2RL1 genetic variants are associated with asthma: a case-control study in the Chinese population.

Human heredity·2025
See all related articles

Statistical tests for family study designs are not universally applicable. Developing a single, powerful test for combined family study data is challenging without knowing the underlying genetic model.

Area of Science:

  • Genetics
  • Biostatistics
  • Statistical Genetics

Background:

  • Statistical tests are specific to family study designs.
  • Different designs may require different hypothesis tests.
  • Combining data from multiple designs poses analytical challenges.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the development of a universally optimal hypothesis test for combined family study data.
  • To address the challenge of analyzing data from heterogeneous family study designs.
  • To determine the feasibility of a single powerful test without prior knowledge of the genetic model.

Main Methods:

  • Examined the validity of test statistics across different family study designs.
  • Developed example association tests for affected singletons and affected sib pairs with parental data.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Assessed the impact of an unknown underlying genetic model on test development.

    • Main Results:

    • Test statistics valid for one family study design may not be valid for others.
    • A universally optimal approach for combined family study data may not exist without knowing the genetic model.
    • The choice of an optimal test is contingent on the specific genetic architecture.

    Conclusions:

    • A single, powerful hypothesis test for combined family study data is not always achievable.
    • Knowledge of the underlying genetic model is crucial for developing optimal statistical approaches.
    • Investigators must carefully consider the family study designs and genetic model when selecting or developing statistical tests.