Related Experiment Videos

[Very long-term outcome of 68 vena cava filters percutaneously implanted]

S Geffroy1, A Furber, P L'Hoste

  • 1Laboratoire d'exploration vasculaire, CHU d'Angers, 4, rue Larrey, 49033 Angers.

Archives Des Maladies Du Coeur Et Des Vaisseaux
|March 21, 2002
PubMed

Insights

Vena caval filters are effective for preventing pulmonary embolism but have significant long-term complications. Their use should be limited to patients with contraindications to anticoagulation.

Area of Science:

  • Vascular Surgery
  • Interventional Radiology
  • Cardiology

Context:

  • Percutaneous vena caval filter implantation is a procedure to prevent pulmonary embolism.
  • The study evaluated long-term outcomes and complications of vena caval filters.

Purpose:

  • To assess the efficacy and safety of vena caval filters in patients with deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism.
  • To identify predictive factors for mortality and filter-related complications.

Summary:

  • 68 patients received vena caval filters, with a mean follow-up of 4.9 years.
  • Mortality was 53%, with factors including contraindication to anticoagulation and malignancy.
  • Recurrence rates were 5.8% for pulmonary embolism and 26.1% for deep vein thrombosis; 25% experienced filter thrombosis.

Impact:

  • Findings suggest vena caval filters should be reserved for specific indications due to high complication rates.
  • Further prospective randomized trials are needed to evaluate other indications for filter implantation.

Related Concept Videos