Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework.

Stephen C Strother1, Jon Anderson, Lars Kai Hansen

  • 1Department of Radiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA.

Neuroimage
|March 22, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Comparison of neural signal sources for discriminating "crave" and "don't crave" task conditions: Implications for fMRI neurofeedback.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

Social network analysis of tail-biting interactions among growing-finishing pigs with intact tails housed in two group sizes.

Journal of animal science·2026
Same author

Episodic Future Thinking as an Intervention for Alcohol Use Disorder: Effects on Delay Discounting and Real-World Alcohol Consumption.

Research square·2026
Same author

Dementia Care Research and Psychosocial Factors.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Neuroanatomical dimensions in major depression linked to cognition, adverse life events, self-harm, metabolomics and genetics.

Communications medicine·2025
Same author

Challenges in explaining deep learning models for data with biological variation.

PloS one·2025

We present NPAIRS (nonparametric prediction, activation, influence, and reproducibility resampling), a new framework for optimizing neuroimaging analysis. It uses real data to assess prediction accuracy and signal-to-noise ratios for reproducible statistical parametric maps.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroimaging
  • Data Analysis
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Functional neuroimaging relies on complex data analysis pipelines.
  • Evaluating the impact of methodological choices on results is challenging.
  • Existing validation methods like simulations may not fully capture real-world data complexities.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce the NPAIRS (nonparametric prediction, activation, influence, and reproducibility resampling) framework.
  • Provide a novel method for evaluating and optimizing neuroimaging analysis pipelines.
  • Establish performance metrics for assessing the relationship between prediction accuracy and reproducibility of statistical parametric maps (SPMs).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized real PET and fMRI data from 12 studies involving motor tasks.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employed cross-validation resampling to plot prediction accuracy against reproducibility signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs).
  • Applied NPAIRS with both univariate and multivariate data-analysis approaches.

    • Main Results:

    • Demonstrated that NPAIRS can yield reproducible SPMs (rSPM[Z]) across different analysis methods.
    • Showed that rSPM[Z] image histograms can be modeled by noise and signal distributions.
    • Explored prediction-reproducibility relationships, highlighting bias-variance tradeoffs.
    • Quantified the variability in reproducibility SNRs and the influence of individual subjects.

    Conclusions:

    • The NPAIRS framework serves as a valuable tool for validating and optimizing neuroimaging data analysis methods.
    • It offers an alternative to traditional simulation-based approaches using real-world data.
    • The framework aids in understanding the interplay between experimental design, data acquisition, and analysis choices.