Validity of randomized clinical trials in gastroenterology from 1964-2000
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.The methodological quality of randomized clinical trials improved over time, with significant gains in the 1990s. However, reporting of trial methods still needs enhancement for better internal validity.
Area Of Science
- Clinical Trials Methodology
- Gastroenterology Research
Background
- Internal validity of clinical trials is crucial and relies on reported methodological quality.
- Assessed 383 randomized clinical trials published in GASTROENTEROLOGY from 1964-2000.
Purpose Of The Study
- To evaluate the methodological quality of randomized clinical trials published in GASTROENTEROLOGY.
- To identify trends in methodological reporting over a 37-year period.
Main Methods
- Extracted data on randomization, blinding, sample size, publication year, and disease area.
- Analyzed changes in methodological quality over time using analysis of variance.
- Adjusted for potential confounding factors in the analysis.
Main Results
- Adequate allocation sequence generation was reported in 42% of trials.
- Adequate allocation concealment was reported in 39% of trials.
- Double-blinding was reported in 62% of trials, with significant improvements noted in the mid-1990s.
Conclusions
- A positive trend in the reported methodological quality of clinical trials was observed.
- Further improvements in the reporting of trial methodologies are recommended to enhance internal validity.