Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 12, 2026

Task Interruption and Resumption Paradigm for Testing the Activation and Pursuit of an Abstract Thinking Goal
Published on: April 18, 2017
Effects of adjusting for censoring on meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes
Claire L Vale1, Jayne F Tierney, Lesley A Stewart
1Meta-Analysis Group, MRC Clinical Trials Unit, London, UK. cv@ctu.mrc.ac.uk
Background:
Systematic reviews of published time-to-event outcomes commonly rely on calculating odds ratios (OR) at fixed points in time and where actual numbers at risk are not presented. These estimates are usually based on the total numbers included in the published analysis and take no account of censoring. We have assessed the impact of adjusting for censoring on weighting, estimates and statistical heterogeneity of meta-analyses in cancer.
Methods:
Meta-analyses of survival data for five meta-analyses of published trials in cancer were conducted. The OR and associated statistics were calculated based on unadjusted total numbers of participants and events. These were compared with calculations that first adjusted the numbers at risk for censoring using a simple model.
Results:
Pooled OR were changed in 17/24 cases. On average, there was a 2.6% difference between the adjusted and unadjusted OR. Confidence intervals were frequently wider for the adjusted OR. Adjusting also reduced weighting of individual trials with immature follow-up. In 18/24 cases, adjusting reduced statistical heterogeneity and affected the associated P-values.
Conclusions:
Reviewers conducting meta-analyses of published time-to-event data where actual numbers at risk are not available should adjust the numbers at risk, estimated from total numbers analysed, to account for immature data and censoring.
More Related Videos
06:55Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Kaplan-Meier Approach
Assumptions of Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Truncation in Survival Analysis
Left truncation occurs when individuals who experienced the event of interest before a certain time are not included in the study. This is often due to a "delayed entry" into the study where only those who survive until a certain entry point are observed.
Censoring Survival Data