Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

The Class III posterior composite restoration.

¹Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, University of California School of Dentistry, San Francisco, Calif., USA. allacy@itsa.ucsf.edu

Dentistry Today

|March 28, 2002

Summary

Minimal invasion dentistry prioritizes preserving tooth structure. For posterior teeth with proximal caries, a class III composite resin restoration is recommended before considering more complex cavity designs.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Restorative dentistry.

Dentistry today·2002

Same author

Porcelain veneers. Problems and solutions.

Dentistry today·2002

See all related articles

Area of Science:

Dentistry
Conservative Dentistry
Restorative Dentistry

Background:

Proximal carious lesions in posterior teeth require restoration.
Conventional Class II restorations are common but may involve more tooth structure removal.
Minimal invasion philosophy emphasizes preserving healthy tooth tissue.

Purpose of the Study:

To advocate for a conservative approach to restoring proximal caries in posterior teeth.
To present the Class III composite resin restoration as a primary option for aesthetic treatment.
To compare the conservative approach with conventional Class II restorations.

Main Methods:

The study is based on the author's clinical experience and philosophy.
It involves the application of Class III composite resin restorations for proximal caries.
Comparison is made with traditional Class II cavity preparations.

Main Results:

Class III composite resin restorations offer an aesthetic and conservative treatment for proximal caries.
This method aligns with the principles of minimal invasion and preservation of sound tooth structure.
Conventional Class II approaches are viewed as less desirable alternatives in this context.

Conclusions:

The Class III composite resin restoration should be considered before more aggressive cavity designs for proximal caries in posterior teeth.
Embracing minimal invasion dentistry necessitates prioritizing conservative treatment options.
Preserving sound tooth structure is paramount in restorative dental practices.

Related Experiment Videos