Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 9, 2026
08:34
Optimizing Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: A Fully 3D CT O-Arm Navigated Workflow in MIS TLIF
Published on: October 17, 2025
365
Immediate placement in extraction sites followed by immediate loading: a pilot study and case presentation
1Departamento de Cirugía Plástica, Universidad de California en San Diego, USA. drianair@san.rr.com
Implant Dentistry
|March 28, 2002
Summary
Immediate loading of dental implants in extraction sites and edentulous sites shows comparable success rates. This dental implant study found similar outcomes for both immediate loading protocols.
Area of Science:
- Dentistry
- Oral Surgery
- Implantology
Background:
- Immediate loading protocols for dental implants are increasingly utilized.
- Comparing outcomes between immediate loading in extraction sites versus edentulous sites is crucial for clinical decision-making.
Observation:
- Seventy-five implants were placed in seven patients, with 29 in immediate extraction sites and 33 in edentulous sites, all considered for immediate or early loading.
- Sixty-two implants were loaded early (less than 3 weeks), with 26 from immediate extraction sites and 33 from edentulous sites.
- Two implants were lost overall; one from an extraction site and one from a non-extraction site. Thirteen implants were buried for conventional healing and showed no failures.
Findings:
- The success rate for implants immediately loaded in extraction sites was comparable to those immediately loaded in edentulous sites.
- Only one implant was lost among the 33 immediately loaded in edentulous areas.
- One implant was lost among the 29 immediately loaded in extraction sites.
Implications:
- Immediate implant loading in both extraction and edentulous sites demonstrates similar predictability and success.
- These findings support the consideration of immediate loading protocols in a broader range of clinical scenarios.
- Further research with larger sample sizes can further validate these comparable outcomes.
