Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Application of cost-effectiveness analysis to multiple products: a practical guide.

Mohan V Bala1, Gary A Zarkin

  • 1Outcomes Research, Centocor, Inc, Malvern, PA 19355, USA. balam@centocor.com

The American Journal of Managed Care
|March 28, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cost-effectiveness of community-based interventions for reducing opioid overdose and non-overdose deaths: simulation modeling of HEALing Communities Study.

Lancet regional health. Americas·2026
Same author

Cascade of Care for Opioid Use Disorder Among Medicaid Beneficiaries.

JAMA network open·2026
Same author

Impact of enhanced practices on opioid overdose deaths: A community-based modeling approach.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2026
Same author

Estimating community-level prevalence of opioid use disorder: Extrapolating from Medicaid claims data and other publicly available data sources in Ohio, USA.

Addiction (Abingdon, England)·2025
Same author

The impact of the communities that HEAL intervention on the provision of jail-based medication for opioid use disorder & linkage programs at release: Results from a randomized, wait-list controlled trial.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2025
Same author

Retention among Medicaid beneficiaries in opioid treatment programs in California.

Journal of substance use and addiction treatment·2025
Same journal

Prescription drug prior authorization: costs to pharmacies and physicians.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Combined pharmacotherapy and psychotherapy impact on opioid use disorder treatment.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

The societal costs of food insecurity: implications for managed care strategies.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Availability of hospital financial assistance documents in non-English languages.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Real-world weight loss with injectable semaglutide vs dulaglutide for diabetes.

The American journal of managed care·2026
Same journal

Social needs screening and supplemental benefits in Medicare Advantage.

The American journal of managed care·2026
See all related articles

This study clarifies how to interpret cost-effectiveness results for choosing the best medical treatments. It presents a graphic framework to guide decisions when multiple interventions are available for a disease.

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Decision analysis
  • Medical treatment evaluation

Background:

  • Interpreting cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) results for treatment decisions is complex and debated.
  • Selecting optimal interventions from multiple options requires clear decision rules.
  • Budget constraints significantly influence treatment choices in healthcare.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To summarize decision rules for selecting interventions based on CEA.
  • To provide a graphic framework for understanding treatment choices.
  • To examine the impact of budget constraints on healthcare decision-making.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic review of health economics literature on decision rules.
  • Development of a graphic framework for intervention selection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of different methods for expressing budget constraints.

    • Main Results:

    • Key decision rules for CEA-based treatment selection were identified.
    • A visual framework effectively illustrates the trade-offs in choosing interventions.
    • The manner in which budget constraints are defined impacts the recommended treatment.

    Conclusions:

    • Clear interpretation of CEA results is crucial for informed treatment decisions.
    • The presented framework aids in navigating complex treatment choices.
    • Understanding budget constraint implications is essential for optimal resource allocation in healthcare.