Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 4, 2026

A Deep-sequencing-assisted, Spontaneous Suppressor Screen in the Fission Yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe
Published on: March 7, 2019
Suppression of genome instability by redundant S-phase checkpoint pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Kyungjae Myung1, Richard D Kolodner
1Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Cancer Center, and Department of Medicine, University of California at San Diego School of Medicine, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Abstract:
Cancer cells show increased genome rearrangements, although it is unclear what defects cause these rearrangements. Previous studies have implicated the Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication checkpoint in the suppression of spontaneous genome rearrangements. In the present study, low doses of methyl methane sulfonate that activate the intra-S checkpoint but not the G1 or G2 DNA damage checkpoints were found to cause increased accumulation of genome rearrangements in both wild-type strains and to an even greater extent in strains containing mutations causing defects in the intra-S checkpoint. The rearrangements were primarily translocations or events resulting in deletion of a portion of a chromosome arm along with the addition of a new telomere. Combinations of mutations causing individual defects in the RAD24 or SGS1 branches of the intra-S checkpoint or the replication checkpoint showed synergistic interactions with regard to the spontaneous genome instability rate. PDS1 and the RAD50-MRE11-XRS2 complex were found to be important members of all the S-phase checkpoints in suppressing genome instability, whereas RAD53 only seemed to play a role in the intra-S checkpoints. Combinations of mutations that seem to result in inactivation of the S-phase checkpoints and critical effectors resulted in as much as 12,000-14,000-fold increases in the genome instability rate. These data support the view that spontaneous genome rearrangements result from DNA replication errors and indicate that there is a high degree of redundancy among the checkpoints that act in S phase to suppress such genome instability.
Insights
DNA replication errors cause genome rearrangements in cancer cells. The intra-S checkpoint and other S-phase checkpoints prevent this instability, with redundancy among them.
Area of Science:
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics
- Cell Biology
Background:
- Cancer cells exhibit increased genome rearrangements, but the underlying defects remain unclear.
- The Saccharomyces cerevisiae replication checkpoint is implicated in suppressing spontaneous genome rearrangements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the role of the intra-S checkpoint in suppressing genome rearrangements.
- To identify specific genes and pathways involved in preventing DNA replication errors and subsequent genomic instability.
Main Methods:
- Utilized methyl methanesulfonate (MMS) to activate the intra-S checkpoint without affecting other DNA damage checkpoints.
- Assessed genome rearrangement rates in wild-type and mutant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains, including those with defects in RAD24, SGS1, PDS1, RAD50-MRE11-XRS2, and RAD53.
- Analyzed synergistic interactions between mutations affecting different checkpoint branches.
Main Results:
- Low doses of MMS increased genome rearrangements, particularly in strains with intra-S checkpoint defects.
- Rearrangements included translocations and deletions with telomere additions.
- Mutations in RAD24, SGS1, PDS1, RAD50-MRE11-XRS2, and RAD53 showed synergistic effects on genome instability.
- Inactivating S-phase checkpoints led to massive increases (12,000-14,000-fold) in genome instability.
Conclusions:
- Spontaneous genome rearrangements arise from DNA replication errors.
- S-phase checkpoints, including the intra-S checkpoint, are crucial for suppressing replication-associated genome instability.
- There is significant redundancy among S-phase checkpoints, highlighting a robust system for maintaining genomic integrity.
More Related Videos
10:39A Suppressor Screen for the Characterization of Genetic Links Regulating Chronological Lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: September 17, 2020
08:40Determination of S-Phase Duration Using 5-Ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine Incorporation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Published on: October 21, 2022
Related Concept Videos
The Cell Cycle Control System
Inhibition of Cdk Activity
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
DNA Damage Can Stall the Cell Cycle
The Spindle Assembly Checkpoint
Many proteins function together to control the spindle assembly checkpoint. Mutations affecting these proteins may allow cells to proceed into anaphase prematurely, resulting in the...
The Cell Cycle Control System
Cyclins and cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdks) are the primary cell cycle regulators and function at the cell...