Related Experiment Video
Updated: Mar 6, 2026

Determining the Likelihood of Variant Pathogenicity Using Amino Acid-level Signal-to-Noise Analysis of Genetic Variation
Published on: January 16, 2019
Use of covariance analysis for the prediction of structural domain boundaries from multiple protein sequence
1Embrapa Genetic Resources and Biotechnology, Cenargen/Embrapa, S.A.I.N. Parque Rural, Final W5, Asa Norte, 70770-900, Brasília, Brazil. daniel@cenargen.embrapa.br
Abstract:
Current methods for identification of domains within protein sequences require either structural information or the identification of homologous domain sequences in different sequence contexts. Knowledge of structural domain boundaries is important for fold recognition experiments and structural determination by X-ray crystallography or nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy using the divide-and-conquer approach. Here, a new and conceptually simple method for the identification of structural domain boundaries in multiple protein sequence alignments is presented. Analysis of covariance at positions within the alignment is first used to predict 3D contacts. By the nature of the domain as an independent folding unit, inter-domain predicted contacts are fewer than intra-domain predicted contacts. By analysing all possible domain boundaries and constructing a smoothed profile of predicted contact density (PCD), true structural domain boundaries are predicted as local profile minima associated with low PCD. A training data set is constructed from 52 non-homologous two-domain protein sequences of known 3D structure and used to determine optimal parameters for the profile analysis. The alignments in the training data set contained 48 +/- 17 (mean +/- SD) sequences and lengths of 257 +/- 121 residues. Of the 47 alignments yielding predictions, 35% of true domain boundaries are predicted to within 15 amino acids by the local profile minimum with the lowest profile value. Including predictions from the second- and third-lowest local minima increases the correct domain boundary coverage to 60%, whereas the lowest five local minima cover 79% of correct domain boundaries. Through further profile analysis, criteria are presented which reliably identify subsets of more accurate predictions. Retrospective analysis of CASP3 targets shows predictions of sufficient accuracy to enable dramatically improved fold recognition results. Finally, a prediction is made for geminivirus AL1 protein which is in full agreement with biochemical data, yielding a plausible, novel threading result.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Conservation of Protein Domains Over Different Proteins
A limited set of protein domains often duplicate and recombine during evolution. These domains can be organized in different combinations to...
Conservation of Protein Domains
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
Conserved Binding Sites
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Protein and Protein Structure
A protein's shape is critical to its function. For example, an enzyme...

