Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Protocol for Relative Hydrodynamic Assessment of Tri-leaflet Polymer Valves
Published on: October 18, 2013
Resource-based relative value units: a primer for academic family physicians
Sarah E Johnson1, Warren P Newton
1Department of Family Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599, USA. johnsons@med.unc.edu
The Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) impacts physician reimbursement, with relative value units (RVUs) quantifying service costs. While RVUs have corrected some payment disparities, they struggle to accurately capture primary care work.
Area of Science:
- Health Economics
- Medical Policy
- Primary Care Research
Background:
- The Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) is the dominant physician reimbursement model in the United States.
- Implemented in 1992, RBRVS aimed to standardize physician payments by considering work, practice expenses, and malpractice costs.
- The RBRVS fee schedule significantly altered Medicare payments, initially benefiting family physicians while reducing specialist reimbursements.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the impact and effectiveness of the Resource-based Relative Value Scale (RBRVS) on physician reimbursement.
- To evaluate the strengths and limitations of relative value units (RVUs) in capturing the complexity of primary care services.
- To understand the implications of RBRVS for the future of primary care.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of historical RBRVS implementation and its effects on Medicare payments.
- Examination of changes in physician reimbursement for different specialties, particularly family medicine versus specialists.
- Review of current RVU adjustments, including practice expense estimates and facility type considerations.
- Assessment of coding limitations and quantification challenges for primary care services within the RVU framework.
Main Results:
- In the initial 6 years post-implementation, Medicare payments increased by 36% for family physicians and decreased by up to 18% for specialists.
- Private payers widely adopt RBRVS, influencing broader payment rates and physician productivity metrics.
- Current RVU systems face limitations in accurately reflecting the value and complexity of primary care services compared to procedural specialties.
Conclusions:
- RBRVS has successfully addressed some historical reimbursement disparities but faces challenges in adequately valuing primary care.
- Coding limitations and the evolving nature of healthcare complicate the accurate quantification of primary care work using RVUs.
- Understanding RBRVS limitations is crucial for protecting and supporting the vital role of primary care physicians.
More Related Videos
06:05The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score (PRIUS): A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
Published on: February 19, 2021
06:50Troubleshooting FoCUS Image Acquisition: Patient Positioning, Transducer Manipulation, and Image Optimization
Published on: March 3, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Base Quantities and Derived Quantities
The International Organization for...
Rational Dosage Regimen: Maintenance Dose and Loading Dose
In most cases, drugs are administered repetitively or infused continuously to maintain a steady-state concentration in the body. At a steady state,...
Bioavailability Study Design: Absolute Versus Relative Bioavailability
Pharmaceutical Equivalents
Dosage Regimens: Partial Pharmacokinetic Parameters
Dosage Regimen: Individualization