Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Proactive and retroactive interference in implicit odor memory.

Egon Peter Köster1, Joachim Degel, Dag Piper

  • 1Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Copenhagen, Denmark. ep.koster@wxs.nl

Chemical Senses
|March 30, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Odor memory longevity is not due to a lack of retroactive interference. Both proactive and retroactive interference impact implicit odor memory, suggesting memory theories need updates for non-verbal information.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Selecting food. The contribution of memory, liking, and action.

Appetite·2014
Same author

Variety and overeating: comments on long-term habituation to food.

The American journal of clinical nutrition·2012
Same author

Incidental and intentional flavor memory in young and older subjects.

Chemical senses·2007
Same author

Do age differences in odour memory depend on differences in verbal memory?

Neuroreport·2004

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Sensory Perception

Background:

  • The longevity of odor memory is often attributed to strong proactive interference and a lack of retroactive interference.
  • Previous research suggested that new learning does not significantly reduce prior odor memories.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the roles of proactive and retroactive interference in the longevity of implicit odor memory.
  • To test the hypothesis that odor memory's persistence is due to the absence of retroactive interference.

Main Methods:

  • Subjects were re-exposed to weak concentrations of familiar odors (lavender or orange) in two sessions.
  • Implicit odor memory was assessed in a subsequent, separate experiment.
  • Results were compared to a prior experiment using matched subjects.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Both proactive interference (new learning impairing prior learning) and retroactive interference (new learning impairing prior memory) were observed.
  • The findings contradict the hypothesis that retroactive interference is absent in odor memory.

Conclusions:

  • The longevity of odor memory is better explained by the low probability of events causing retroactive interference, not its absence.
  • Existing theories of implicit memory for new associations may require revision for non-verbal materials.