Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Phylogeny01:23

Phylogeny

55.6K
Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon (singular). Taxa (plural) can span different levels of the evolutionary hierarchy. For instance, the group containing all birds is a taxon (comprising the class Aves), and the group of all species of daisies (the genus Bellis) is a taxon. Phylogenies can likewise include just one genus (i.e., depict species relationships) or span an entire kingdom.
55.6K
Three-Domain System of Life01:21

Three-Domain System of Life

408
Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequence analysis revealed three distinct groups of cells: eukaryotes, bacteria, and archaea. In 1978, Carl R. Woese proposed the concept of domains, a taxonomic level above kingdoms, to differentiate these groups. He suggested that archaea and bacteria, despite their similar appearance, represent separate domains. Domains differ in rRNA, membrane lipid structure, transfer RNA, and antibiotic sensitivity.In this classification, animals, plants, and fungi belong to the...
408
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.5K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.5K
Synteny and Evolution02:31

Synteny and Evolution

3.5K
John H. Renwick first coined the term “synteny” in 1971, which refers to the genes present on the same chromosomes, even if they are not genetically linked. The species with common ancestry tend to show conserved syntenic regions. Therefore, the concept of synteny is nowadays used to describe the evolutionary relationship between species.
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
3.5K
Convergent Evolution01:54

Convergent Evolution

29.9K
Evolution shapes the features of organisms over time, ensuring that they are suited for the environments in which they live. Sometimes, selection pressure leads to the rise of similar but unrelated adaptations in organisms with no recent common ancestors, a process known as convergent evolution.
29.9K
The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes02:40

The Tree of Life - Bacteria, Archaea, Eukaryotes

36.3K
The “tree of life” describes the evolution of life and the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The root of the tree is the common ancestor to all life on Earth. All other species radiate from this point, much like the branches of a tree. The numerous tips of these branches on the tree of life represent every living, or extant, species. Extinct species, which are species that no longer exist, can be found towards the center of the tree. Currently, these organisms, both...
36.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

High-throughput phenomics of global ant biodiversity.

Nature methods·2026
Same author

Natural selection and language genes in humans.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Mitochondrial Gene Phylogenetic Incongruencies Are Linked to Chromosomal Position and Function.

Genome biology and evolution·2025
Same author

Digging into the evolutionary history of the fungus-growing-ant symbiont, Escovopsis (Hypocreaceae).

Communications biology·2025
Same author

Adaptive radiation and social evolution of the ants.

Cell·2025
Same author

Morphological data, phylogenomics and recalcitrant nodes.

Cladistics : the international journal of the Willi Hennig Society·2025
Same journal

Forensic toxicology.

EXS·2010
Same journal

Biological warfare agents.

EXS·2010
Same journal

Chemical warfare agents.

EXS·2010
Same journal

Drugs of abuse: management of intoxication and antidotes.

EXS·2010
Same journal

Biological testing for drugs of abuse.

EXS·2010
Same journal

Inhalation toxicology.

EXS·2010
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Oct 30, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

344

Development, homology and systematics.

Ranhy Bang1, Ted R Schultz, Rob DeSalle

  • 1Graduate Training Program in Arthropod Systematics, Department of Entomology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.

EXS
|April 2, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study reviews how evolutionary developmental biology (Evo-Devo) data impacts phylogenetic analysis. It emphasizes the critical need to redefine character recognition and delimitation for accurate evolutionary reconstructions.

More Related Videos

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.1K
Using Whole Mount in situ Hybridization to Link Molecular and Organismal Biology
12:50

Using Whole Mount in situ Hybridization to Link Molecular and Organismal Biology

Published on: March 31, 2011

21.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Oct 30, 2025

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles
10:23

A Concoction Pipeline for Generating Molecular Operational Taxonomic Units (MOTUs) Among Riparian and Aquatic Beetles

Published on: July 11, 2025

344
Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin
08:57

Using Phylogenetic Analysis to Investigate Eukaryotic Gene Origin

Published on: August 14, 2018

16.1K
Using Whole Mount in situ Hybridization to Link Molecular and Organismal Biology
12:50

Using Whole Mount in situ Hybridization to Link Molecular and Organismal Biology

Published on: March 31, 2011

21.9K

Area of Science:

  • Systematics and Phylogenetics
  • Evolutionary Developmental Biology (Evo-Devo)

Background:

  • Traditional cladistic literature has addressed character recognition across biological organization levels (molecular, cellular, morphological, behavioral).
  • The influx of new data, particularly from Evo-Devo, necessitates a re-evaluation of established theoretical and methodological approaches in systematics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review traditional theoretical and methodological approaches for interpreting Evo-Devo data in phylogenetic analyses.
  • To explore the role of recent Evo-Devo studies within the field of systematics.
  • To contextualize Evo-Devo literature within the broader framework of systematics.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review of cladistic and Evo-Devo studies.
  • Analysis of character recognition and delimitation principles in phylogeny reconstruction.
  • Systematic contextualization of Evo-Devo findings.

Main Results:

  • Phylogenetic analysis conclusions are fundamentally dependent on the initial recognition and definition of characters.
  • Evo-Devo data presents new challenges and opportunities for defining characters used in phylogenetic reconstruction.
  • Existing systematic frameworks require adaptation to effectively integrate Evo-Devo insights.

Conclusions:

  • A critical review of character delimitation is essential for incorporating Evo-Devo data into systematics.
  • Revising theoretical and methodological approaches is crucial for accurate phylogenetic analyses incorporating Evo-Devo.
  • Integrating Evo-Devo into systematics enhances our understanding of evolutionary relationships.