Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Eugenics or empowered choice? Community issues arising from prenatal testing.

Malcolm H Parker1, Kevin L Forbes, Ian Findlay

  • 1School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.

The Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
|April 3, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Top 10 public health challenges to track in 2023: Shifting focus beyond a global pandemic.

Public health challenges·2025
Same author

Selective Inhibition of Pulmonary Vein Excitability by Constitutively Active GIRK Channels Blockade in Rats.

International journal of molecular sciences·2023
Same author

Spiky: An ImageJ Plugin for Data Analysis of Functional Cardiac and Cardiomyocyte Studies.

Journal of imaging·2022
Same author

Automatic Activity Arising in Cardiac Muscle Sleeves of the Pulmonary Vein.

Biomolecules·2022
Same author

Development of Voluntary Assisted Dying Training in Victoria, Australia: A Model for Consideration.

Journal of palliative care·2020
Same author

Selective inhibition of electrical conduction within the pulmonary veins by α1-adrenergic receptors activation in the Rat.

Scientific reports·2020

Preventing inherited disabilities through genetic screening and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) reflects community desire, not discrimination. Open debate on reproductive choice, disability, and eugenics is crucial for informed decision-making.

Area of Science:

  • Medical Genetics
  • Bioethics
  • Public Health

Background:

  • Inherited disabilities present complex ethical and societal challenges.
  • Genetic prevention strategies are viewed through contrasting lenses: reproductive autonomy versus disability discrimination.
  • Modern genetic technologies like PGD raise questions about societal values and eugenics.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To analyze the ethical implications of preventing inherited disabilities.
  • To examine whether modern genetic technologies constitute a "new eugenics" or enhance reproductive choice.
  • To advocate for improved community understanding and debate on genetic screening and disability.

Main Methods:

  • Ethical analysis of genetic prevention strategies.
  • Review of clinical genetics practices, including preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD).
Keywords:
Clients Right of Complaint (Care Sector) Act (Netherlands)Genetics and Reproduction

Related Experiment Videos

  • Discussion of societal perspectives on disability, reproductive freedom, and eugenics.

    • Main Results:

    • Modern clinical genetics, including PGD, reflects a defensible community desire to prevent disability.
    • These practices are argued to enhance reproductive choice and population health, rather than increase discrimination.
    • Screening decisions require careful consideration distinct from routine antenatal care.

    Conclusions:

    • The prevention of inherited disabilities is a complex issue requiring nuanced ethical consideration.
    • Community understanding of disability experiences must be enhanced.
    • Ongoing debate on genetic prevention, reproductive freedom, and eugenics is essential.