[Pathological examination of breast biopsy specimens]

No differences for long-term disease free survival could be found between breast conserving surgery and mastectomy. Most importantly is the fact that this therapy presents a significantly higher risk for local recurrence. The characterisation of this risk is one of the most important things to do. These findings result in a widespread change in treatment of breast cancer patients. Consequently an increase in interdisciplinary working between radiologists, surgeons and pathologists could be found. Histological examinations are necessary for diagnosis and exactly evaluation of the tumor extension. Microscopic evaluation of the resection margin is of most important interest, because there is a direct connection between local recurrence and tumor infiltration of the resection margin. We performed our investigations by the use of a standardized complete embedding method with the possibility of three-dimensional reconstruction, on a cohort of 280 patients. Additionally this method allowed the detection of all relevant findings on one hand and on the other hand an evaluation of all resection margins. Our results showed a breast conserving therapy including tumor free margins was performed in 67% of the patients. But there was a second resection necessary in 57% of the cases. An extensive tumor distribution as the detection of multifocal tumor spread was the reason for mastectomy in 33%. Our findings point out the necessarily of the histological examination in the line of the complete embedding method of the breast biopsy material in order to analyse the tumor including resection margin evaluation.