Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Learning to perceive pitch differences.

Laurent Demany1, Catherine Semal

  • 1Laboratoire de Neurophysiologie, Université Victor Segalen and CNRS (UMR 5543), Bordeaux, France. Laurent.Demany@psyac.u-bordeaux2.fr

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
|April 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Is pitch a smooth function of frequency? Evidence from octave adjustments.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same author

Simple frequency ratios naturally make precisely perceived melodies.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Controlling audibility with noise for online experiments using sound.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

The perception of octave pitch affinity and harmonic fusion have a common origin.

Hearing research·2021
Same author

Auditory Perception: Relative Universals for Musical Pitch.

Current biology : CB·2019
Same author

Effect of stimulus type and pitch salience on pitch-sequence processing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2018
Same journal

High-resolution depth estimation for multiple wideband sources in deep sea via sparse Bayesian learninga).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Depression markers in speech: An approach based on tract variables dynamics.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The oyster toadfish (Opsanus tau) alters active and diurnal calling amid vessel noise in New York City.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Experimental noise characterisation of phase-locked tandem-rotor in edgewise flight.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

The tune-text-temporal synergy: Prosodic effects of final segmental weakening in Neapolitan.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Same journal

Monitoring vessel movement above critical offshore infrastructure using distributed acoustic sensing.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
See all related articles

Pitch discrimination learning is frequency-specific and not strongly ear-specific. Learning complex tones is also timbre-specific, indicating pitch perception relies on more than just internal noise reduction.

Area of Science:

  • Auditory perception
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Perceptual learning enhances sensory discrimination abilities through training.
  • Understanding the specificity of auditory learning is crucial for explaining how the brain processes sound.
  • Previous research suggests auditory learning can be specific to various stimulus features.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the stimulus specificity of pitch discrimination learning.
  • To determine if pitch learning is specific to frequency, ear, or timbre.
  • To differentiate between stimulus-specific learning and general internal noise reduction.

Main Methods:

  • Experiment 1: Monaural pure-tone pitch discrimination training (3000 Hz) followed by testing with different frequencies and the contralateral ear.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Experiment 2: Complex-tone pitch discrimination training (harmonics 3-7) followed by testing with pure tones matching the fundamental or remote frequencies.
  • Quantification of learning through changes in discrimination thresholds.

    • Main Results:

    • Pitch discrimination learning was found to be frequency-specific in Experiment 1.
    • Learning showed minimal or no transfer to the contralateral ear, suggesting weak ear-specificity.
    • In Experiment 2, pitch discrimination learning with complex tones did not transfer well to pure tones, even when matched for pitch, indicating timbre-specificity.

    Conclusions:

    • Pitch discrimination learning is specific to the trained stimulus features, particularly frequency and timbre.
    • The findings challenge the notion that pitch discrimination learning is solely a reduction of internal neural noise.
    • Auditory learning mechanisms are sophisticated and depend on detailed stimulus characteristics, not just general pitch information.