Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

9.8K
An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a  sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval  contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A...
9.8K
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

9.0K
A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
9.0K
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

8.7K
A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
8.7K
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

10.1K
The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under...
10.1K
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

499
Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and...
499
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

9.8K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
9.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same journal

Semiparametric Panel Count Model, With Applications to Signal Detection in Post-Market Drug Surveillance Systems.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Pragmatic Designs for Combining Cyclic Laboratory and Monitor Data.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Choosing Covariate Balancing Methods for Causal Inference: Practical Insights From a Simulation Study.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Checking Genetic Homogeneity Between Two Samples Using Summary Statistics With Application to Mendelian Randomization.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

A Bayesian Learning Model for Joint Risk Prediction of Alcohol and Cannabis Use Disorders.

Statistics in medicine·2026
Same journal

Reluctant Transfer Learning in Penalized Regressions for Individualized Treatment Rules Under Effect Heterogeneity.

Statistics in medicine·2026
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

584

Non-parametric confidence interval estimation for competing risks analysis: application to contraceptive data.

Jahar B Choudhury1

  • 1Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, WA 6907, Australia. jahar@maths.uwa.edu.au

Statistics in Medicine
|April 5, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a method for estimating failure probabilities with competing risks, crucial for understanding contraceptive use dynamics. The Dinse and Larson formula with a log(-log) transform provides reliable standard error estimates and accurate confidence intervals.

More Related Videos

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Dec 26, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
06:46

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery

Published on: September 27, 2024

584
An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

2.5K
Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

10.7K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Epidemiology
  • Demography

Background:

  • Analyzing failure probabilities in the presence of competing risks is essential for understanding complex event dynamics.
  • Contraceptive use dynamics present a common scenario with competing risks, where multiple reasons for discontinuation exist.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To discuss non-parametric maximum likelihood estimation of cause-specific failure probability and its standard error.
  • To evaluate the accuracy of confidence intervals derived from different transformation methods.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized cause-specific incidence functions for summarizing failure rates from right-censored data.
  • Applied Dinse and Larson's formula for standard error calculation and confidence interval construction.
  • Compared interval accuracy using simulations, including log(-log) and arcsine transformations.

Main Results:

  • The cause-specific incidence function offers an intuitive summary of failure rates.
  • Dinse and Larson's formula, combined with a log(-log) transformation, demonstrated reliable standard error estimation.
  • This method achieved accurate coverage in both small and large sample sizes.

Conclusions:

  • The Dinse and Larson formula, with a log(-log) transform, is recommended for estimating cause-specific failure probabilities and standard errors in competing risks scenarios.
  • This approach is robust and accurate across various sample sizes.
  • Findings are applicable to analyzing contraceptive use dynamics and similar demographic data.