Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

QALYs, standard gambles, and the expected budget constraint.

Ake Blomqvist¹

¹Department of Economics, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada. akeb@uwo.ca

Journal of Health Economics

|April 10, 2002

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Determining the Public/Private Mix: Options for Financing Targeted Universality in Long-Term Care.

HealthcarePapers·2016

Same author

Information asymmetry, insurance, and the decision to hospitalize.

Journal of health economics·2005

Same author

Defining the value of a statistical life: a comment.

Journal of health economics·2002

Same journal

Competition matters: Uniform vs. indication-based pricing of pharmaceuticals.

Journal of health economics·2026

Same journal

Integrating equity and productivity in health evaluation.

Journal of health economics·2026

Same journal

Income and immunity: The consequences of social security administration reform for childhood infection risk.

Journal of health economics·2026

Same journal

When fewer children mean shorter lives: Fertility policy and elderly well-being in China.

Journal of health economics·2026

Same journal

Health dynamics and reporting bias at retirement: An analysis using high-frequency data.

Journal of health economics·2026

Same journal

Intertemporal coordination in volunteer markets.

Journal of health economics·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Assumptions about financial consequences in quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) calculations are crucial for cost-utility analysis (CUA). Misstating these assumptions can bias healthcare decisions, particularly against older individuals.

Area of Science:

Health Economics
Decision Analysis
Public Health Policy

Background:

Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) indices are vital for cost-utility analysis (CUA) in healthcare decision-making.
Standard-gamble questions are commonly used to establish QALY values, but their interpretation relies on respondent assumptions.
Previous research suggests including future consumption in cost-per-QALY calculations for life-saving interventions.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine the impact of respondent assumptions about financial consequences on QALY values.
To reassess the validity of including future consumption in cost-per-QALY calculations.
To investigate the efficiency of budget allocation using CUA and identify potential biases.

Main Methods:

Analysis of standard-gamble question methodology.

Related Experiment Videos

Theoretical modeling of QALY index construction and its implications for CUA.

Evaluation of economic efficiency under fixed healthcare budgets.

Main Results:

Respondent assumptions regarding financial consequences significantly influence QALY values and CUA outcomes.
The validity of including future consumption in cost-per-QALY calculations is contingent on the QALY index establishment method.
Cost-utility analysis with a fixed budget does not generally lead to second-best efficient allocation.
Ambiguous financial consequence assumptions in standard-gamble questions can bias against older individuals.

Conclusions:

Careful specification of financial consequences in QALY assessments is essential for accurate CUA.
The method of QALY index construction critically affects the interpretation of cost-effectiveness results.
CUA may not ensure optimal resource allocation, and biases against certain populations can occur.
Further research is needed to refine QALY measurement and CUA methodology to ensure equitable healthcare resource allocation.