Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How should we grade CIN?

M K Heatley1

  • 1Department of Histopathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Histopathology
|April 12, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Grading cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) is challenging due to its continuous nature and classification issues. Experts discuss improved methods for accurate CIN grading and distinguishing it from mimics.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

An audit to establish the proportion of cervical punch biopsies that meet criteria for adequacy.

Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·2010
Same author

Are levels in cervical specimens necessary?

Journal of clinical pathology·2009
Same author

Comparison of examination of the entire cervix with routine cervical sampling in hysterectomy specimens from women with endometrial cancer: comment on a paper.

Journal of clinical pathology·2008
Same author

Immunohistochemical biomarkers of value in distinguishing primary ovarian carcinoma from gastric carcinoma: a systematic review with statistical meta-analysis.

Histopathology·2007
Same author

Dissection and reporting of the organs of the female genital tract.

Journal of clinical pathology·2007
Same author

Villoglandular adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix-a systematic review of the literature.

Histopathology·2007

Area of Science:

  • Gynecologic pathology
  • Cervical cancer screening
  • Histopathology

Background:

  • Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grading is complex, with lesions existing on a morphological continuum.
  • Current two or three-tier grading systems (e.g., Bethesda) exhibit poor reproducibility.
  • Distinguishing low-grade CIN from reactive changes presents diagnostic difficulties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To address the problematic nature of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grading.
  • To explore potential improvements in CIN classification and reproducibility.
  • To investigate methods for reliably differentiating low-grade CIN from mimics.

Main Methods:

  • Commissioned three expert contributions.
  • Focused on the question of how to grade CIN.
  • Addressed issues of inter- and intra-observer disagreement in CIN diagnosis.

Main Results:

  • Highlights significant challenges in current CIN grading systems.
  • Identifies poor reproducibility as a key issue in CIN classification.
  • Underscores difficulties in distinguishing CIN from reactive simulants.

Conclusions:

  • Current CIN grading methods are problematic and require re-evaluation.
  • Improved diagnostic criteria and reproducibility are needed for accurate CIN assessment.
  • Further research and expert consensus are essential for optimizing CIN grading.

Related Experiment Videos