Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
Published on: January 8, 2020
On the variability of covariate adjustment. experience with Koch's method for evaluating the absolute difference in
Emmanuel Lesaffre1, Kris Bogaerts, Xin Li
1Biostatistical Centre, Catholic University of Leuven, U.Z. St. Rafael, Kapucijnenvoer 35, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. emmanuel.lesaffre@med.kuleuven.ac.be
Abstract:
Recently Koch et al. suggested an interesting approach for covariate adjustment in randomized clinical trials. Here we report our experience with the approach in Assent II, a large randomized trial comparing 30-day mortality rates of two thrombolytic treatments. Data from the Gusto-I study and a recent successor to the Assent II study will also be used. Further, we balance the advantage of covariate adjustment (with Koch's method) to the extra efforts and resources necessary. In this context we highlight the fact that there is a potential risk of using a covariate-adjusted analysis as primary analysis and show that covariate adjustment has the least effect when it is needed most. Analytic results will be given to quantify this risk and a simulation study illustrates our findings.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Variability: Analysis
The range is a simple measure of variability, indicating the difference between the highest and...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

