Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Hemispheric processing differences revealed by differential conditioning and reaction time performance.

J B Hellige

    Journal of Experimental Psychology. General
    |December 1, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The role of noun imagery in the speed of processing the grammaticality of adjective-noun phrases.

    Memory & cognition·2013
    Same author

    Recognition of CVC Syllables from LVF, RVF, and Central Locations: Hemispheric Differences and Interhemispheric Interaction.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Categorical versus Coordinate Spatial Processing: Effects of Blurring and Hemispheric Asymmetry.

    Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2013
    Same author

    Hemispheric asymmetry for word naming: effects of frequency and regularity of pronunciation.

    Laterality·2004
    Same author

    Are hemispheric strategy differences independent of the level of performance?

    Neuropsychology·2001
    Same author

    Categorical and coordinate spatial processing: more on contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.

    Brain and cognition·2001
    Same journal

    Executive function and social behavior: Causal evidence from loading working memory and inhibitory control.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Your research is public engagement: A case for more intentional science communication in research with human subjects" by Vaughn (2026).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Costs and benefits of acting extraverted: A randomized controlled trial" by Jacques-Hamilton et al. (2019).

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Conveying (discrete) emotionality with novel words.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    Physical actions shape moral choices: Environment-directed movements reduce cheating in young children.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    Same journal

    From chunks to schemas: Learning in the Hebb repetition paradigm.

    Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
    See all related articles

    Individuals differ in how their brains process information, impacting conditioned responses and hemisphere specialization. These differences are crucial for understanding classical conditioning and brain organization.

    Area of Science:

    • Cognitive Neuroscience
    • Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Individual differences in information processing exist.
    • Classical eyelid conditioning can reveal these differences.
    • Cerebral hemisphere specialization is a key area of study.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate information-processing differences between subject groups (Cs and Vs).
    • To examine information-processing differences between the right and left cerebral hemispheres.
    • To explore parallels between subject group differences and hemisphere specialization.

    Main Methods:

    • Two experiments using differential eyelid conditioning and reaction time tasks.
    • Stimuli presented to left and right visual fields to assess hemisphere involvement.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Subjects categorized as Cs or Vs based on conditioning patterns.

    • Main Results:

    • Subject group Cs showed hemisphere-specific processing of semantic stimuli, unlike Vs.
    • Left hemisphere advantage for verbal stimuli was more pronounced in Cs.
    • Visuospatial processing showed a right-hemisphere advantage for both groups.

    Conclusions:

    • Subject groups Cs and Vs exhibit distinct information-processing modes.
    • These processing modes are linked to cerebral hemisphere organization.
    • Individual differences in hemisphere mobilization are significant for conditioning and brain specialization models.