Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Communication challenges for science and religion.

J M Valenti1

  • 1Department of Communications, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah. valentij@byu.edu

Public Understanding of Science (Bristol, England)
|April 13, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Improving the scientist/journalist conversation.

Science and engineering ethics·2001
Same author

Communicating with environmental and health risk takers: an individual differences perspective.

Health education quarterly·1991
Same journal

Science communication as a wicked problem: Revisiting the paradigms of deficits.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Willingness to participate in medical research: Unraveling the roles of scientific literacy and beliefs about medical researchers.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Does medium matter? Political orientation and variability in scientific self-perceptions.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Public backlash against science communicators: Conceptualization and qualitative analysis of perceptions, effects, responses, and contextual factors.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Experts' boundary work on social media: Doctors on Instagram.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
Same journal

Too sure or not sure enough? Trust may hinge on scientists' uncertainty matching knowledgeable audiences' tolerance for it.

Public understanding of science (Bristol, England)·2026
See all related articles

This study explores how science and religion can bridge their differences for effective communication. It investigates potential collaborations to enhance public science understanding and inform policy without compromising spiritual well-being.

Area of Science:

  • Interdisciplinary studies
  • Science communication
  • Philosophy of science and religion

Background:

  • Science relies on empirical evidence and testable hypotheses.
  • Religion often involves faith, dogma, and spiritual experiences.
  • Effective communication between these domains is challenging due to fundamental differences in epistemology.

Observation:

  • The abstract questions the possibility of collaboration between science and religion.
  • It highlights the contrasting methodologies: science's demand for evidence versus religion's reliance on faith.
  • The core issue is how to foster mutual understanding and joint action.

Findings:

  • Scholars are actively exploring and engineering interdisciplinary bridges.
  • Potential exists for collaboration to improve public science literacy.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Joint efforts may influence policy-making while respecting spiritual values.

    • Implications:

    • Successful collaboration can lead to a more informed public discourse on science and policy.
    • Bridging the science-religion divide can foster societal well-being.
    • This interdisciplinary approach may redefine the relationship between scientific and spiritual communities.