Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 8, 2026

Experimental Human Pneumococcal Carriage
Published on: February 15, 2013
Experience of prophylaxis treatment in children with severe haemophilia
T T Yee1, K Beeton, A Griffioen
1Haemophilia centre and Haemostasis Unit, Royal Free NHS Trust, UK. t.yee@rfc.ucl.ac.uk
Insights
Prophylactic treatment for severe haemophilia in boys significantly improved quality of life and enabled physical activity. This approach prevented inhibitor development and reduced joint bleeds, enhancing overall well-being.
Area of Science:
- Paediatric Haematology
- Bleeding Disorders Management
- Prophylactic Therapy
Background:
- Severe haemophilia management traditionally focused on episodic treatment.
- Prophylaxis aims to prevent bleeding episodes and long-term joint damage.
- Early evaluation of prophylactic strategies is crucial for optimizing outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the practice and outcomes of prophylactic treatment in boys with severe haemophilia.
- To assess the effectiveness of prophylaxis in preventing bleeds and inhibitor development.
- To analyze the impact of prophylaxis on quality of life and patient management.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 41 boys with severe haemophilia under 17 years.
- Data collection on age at prophylaxis initiation, follow-up duration, and joint bleeds.
- Assessment of inhibitor development, venous access methods, and clinical joint scores.
Main Results:
- Prophylaxis initiated at a median age of 3.7 years in 93% of patients.
- 76% started prophylaxis after initial bleeds, yet 70% achieved a clinical joint score of 0.
- No new inhibitors developed on prophylaxis; pre-existing low-titre inhibitors became undetectable.
Conclusions:
- Prophylactic treatment is effective in severe haemophilia, preventing bleeds and inhibitors.
- It enables increased physical activity and improves quality of life for patients and families.
- Home-based peripheral venous access reduces hospital visits, despite initial training investment.
Abstract:
The practice of prophylactic treatment of boys with severe haemophilia has been evaluated in our centre. Prophylaxis was started at the median age of 3.7 years (range 0.4-12.7 years) in 38/41 children (93%) under 17 years of age. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0.4-12.7 years). The criteria of primary prophylaxis according to the definition by the European Paediatric Network of Haemophilia Management was fulfilled by 9/38 (24%). Although a majority [76%, 29/38] of the children started prophylaxis after a median number of joint bleeds of 3.5, 70% of the children in this group had clinical joint scores of 0. Intravenous catheter insertion was required at a median age of 15.5 months (range 5-36 months) in 21% of the children, resulting in a catheter infection rate of 1.74 per 1000 catheter days. None developed an inhibitor on prophylaxis and three patients who had low-titre inhibitors (< 5 Bethesda units) prior to prophylaxis had undetectable inhibitors after prophylaxis. The home-treatment training programme required considerable time and cost. As a result, 87% of the children used peripheral venous access and hospital visits declined as prophylaxis became established. Parents' incentives for prophylaxis were that the children undertook many physical activities and sports previously not recommended, there was less parental anxiety and an overall improvement in the quality of life for the whole family.
Related Concept Videos
Anticoagulant Drugs: Low-Molecular-Weight Heparins
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
Venous Thrombosis III: Interprofessional Care
Smallpox

