Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Precision Implementation of Minimal Erythema Dose (MED) Testing to Assess Individual Variation in Human Inflammatory Response
Published on: October 3, 2019
Erythema migrans and the differential diagnosis of annular erythema
Renee H Grau1, Pamela S Allen, Raymond L Cornelison
1University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Department of Dermatology, 619 Northeast 13th Street, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, USA.
Abstract:
The diagnosis of Lyme disease (LD) or Lyme borreliosis is often based on the recognition of erythema migrans (EM) because its clinical appearance precedes systemic manifestations of the disease and the antibody response. The clinical basis and variable presentation of EM leave room for diagnostic error and, as a consequence, potential long-term repercussions such as rheumatic, cardiac, ophthalmic, or neurologic complications. Most cases are reported in the Northcentral and Northeastern states. In areas where LD is not endemic, the differential diagnosis of annular erythema may not list EM highly, although all the features of a lesion may fit the typical description of EM. Therefore, a complete understanding of LD and its clinical presentation are key in making a diagnosis, especially in areas with low incidence. We present a hypothetical case report of EM from Oklahoma, a state with low incidence of LD, for the purposes of review of this entity and the differential diagnosis of annular erythema.
Insights
Early recognition of erythema migrans (EM), the hallmark of Lyme disease (LD), is crucial for timely diagnosis and preventing severe complications. This review emphasizes understanding EM
Area of Science:
- Infectious Diseases
- Dermatology
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Lyme disease (LD) diagnosis frequently relies on erythema migrans (EM) recognition due to its early appearance before systemic symptoms or antibody response.
- Variable EM presentation and diagnostic challenges can lead to delayed treatment and potential long-term rheumatic, cardiac, ophthalmic, or neurologic complications.
Observation:
- Erythema migrans (EM) can be misdiagnosed, especially in non-endemic regions where it may not be highly suspected.
- A hypothetical case report from Oklahoma, a low-incidence state, highlights the importance of considering EM in differential diagnoses of annular lesions.
Findings:
- Accurate identification of erythema migrans (EM) is critical for diagnosing Lyme disease (LD).
- Understanding the diverse clinical presentations of EM is essential for accurate diagnosis, particularly in areas with low LD incidence.
Implications:
- Improved diagnostic accuracy for erythema migrans (EM) can prevent severe Lyme disease (LD) complications.
- Clinicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for Lyme disease (LD) and its characteristic rash, even in low-incidence areas.
Related Concept Videos
Endocarditis II: Clinical Features of Infective Endocarditis
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Myocarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests
Rheumatic Heart Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
