Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Who should have priority for a knee joint replacement?

G M Woolhead1, J L Donovan, J A Chard

  • 1Medical Research Council Health Services Research Collaboration, Department of Social Medicine, Canynge Hall, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 2PR, UK.

Rheumatology (Oxford, England)
|April 19, 2002
PubMed
Summary

Patients believe total knee replacement (TKR) priority should consider suffering, pain, and immobility, not just age or weight. Fair prioritization requires including patient circumstances alongside clinical factors for joint surgery.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Review of the recruitment process for a large investigator-initiated trial in early Parkinson's disease.

Trials·2022
Same author

Patient experiences of receiving arthroscopic surgery or personalised hip therapy for femoroacetabular impingement in the context of the UK fashion study: a qualitative study.

Trials·2021
Same author

Men's experiences of radiotherapy treatment for localized prostate cancer and its long-term treatment side effects: a longitudinal qualitative study.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2021
Same author

Modelling the lifetime cost-effectiveness of radical prostatectomy, radiotherapy and active monitoring for men with clinically localised prostate cancer from median 10-year outcomes in the ProtecT randomised trial.

BMC cancer·2020
Same author

Strategies to Improve Recruitment to a De-escalation Trial: A Mixed-Methods Study of the OPTIMA Prelim Trial in Early Breast Cancer.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2020
Same author

Correction to: The help for people with money, employment or housing problems (HOPE) intervention: pilot randomised trial with mixed methods feasibility research.

Pilot and feasibility studies·2018

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedics
  • Health Services Research
  • Patient Experience

Background:

  • Total knee replacement (TKR) is a common procedure for severe knee osteoarthritis.
  • Waiting lists and prioritization for TKR are significant issues in healthcare systems.
  • Understanding patient perspectives on prioritization is crucial for equitable resource allocation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore patients' views on priority criteria for total knee replacement (TKR).
  • To compare patient-perceived prioritization with actual practices.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted in-depth, semistructured interviews with 25 patients awaiting TKR.
  • Analyzed qualitative data to identify themes related to prioritization.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • Patients believe TKR priority should be based on suffering, pain severity, immobility, employment, contributions, and caregiving responsibilities.
  • Patients perceive that actual prioritization is influenced by age, weight, complaining, and private healthcare access.
  • Discrepancies exist between ideal patient-centered criteria and perceived system-based criteria.

Conclusions:

  • Patients agree with professionals that pain and disability are key TKR prioritization criteria.
  • Patients advocate for a fair decision-making process incorporating individual circumstances.
  • Prioritization criteria for joint surgery must integrate both patient and professional viewpoints for optimal outcomes.