Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative professional plaque removal study using 8 branded toothbrushes.

N Claydon1, M Addy, C Scratcher

  • 1Division of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, Bristol, UK.

Journal of Clinical Periodontology
|April 23, 2002
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emergencies during neurosurgery and neuroradiology.

BJA education·2023
Same author

Measurement of CP Violation in the Decay B^{+}→K^{+}π^{0}.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Observation of Multiplicity Dependent Prompt χ_{c1}(3872) and ψ(2S) Production in pp Collisions.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

First Observation of the Decay B_{s}^{0}→K^{-}μ^{+}ν_{μ} and a Measurement of |V_{ub}|/|V_{cb}|.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Model-Independent Study of Structure in B^{+}→D^{+}D^{-}K^{+} Decays.

Physical review letters·2021
Same author

Constraints on the K_{S}^{0}→μ^{+}μ^{-} Branching Fraction.

Physical review letters·2020
Same journal

Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Platforms for the Diagnosis and Management of Periodontal Diseases: A Blinded Expert-Rated Comparative Study of 11 Systems.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same journal

Local Sodium Tanshinone IIA Sulfonate Attenuates Periodontal Bone Loss by Modulating Inflammatory, Immune and Osteoclastogenic Signalling.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same journal

Correction to ''Clinical Efficacy of Interventions Based on Professional Mechanical Plaque Removal in the Treatment of Dental Biofilm-Induced Gingivitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis''.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same journal

Extracellular Vesicles From Young Brain-Mediated Delivery of PRDX3 Ameliorates Alveolar Bone Loss in Periodontitis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same journal

Cost Consequence Analysis of Non-Surgical Treatment Approaches for Patients With Periodontitis.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
Same journal

Management of Non-Plaque-Induced Gingival Conditions: A Systematic Review-Part 2: Inflammatory and Immune Conditions; Neoplasms; and Gingival Pigmentation.

Journal of clinical periodontology·2026
See all related articles

This study found no significant difference in plaque removal between eight manual toothbrush designs when used by a professional brusher. User technique, not toothbrush design, is the most critical factor for effective plaque removal.

Area of Science:

  • Dental hygiene
  • Oral health research
  • Biomechanical engineering

Background:

  • Modern toothbrush designs have garnered significant interest for their plaque removal capabilities.
  • Evaluating the efficacy of various manual toothbrush designs is crucial for public oral health.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the plaque removal efficiency of eight distinct manual toothbrush designs.
  • To assess plaque accumulation and removal patterns using a standardized, timed professional brushing method.

Main Methods:

  • An 8-period, randomized, blind cross-over study involving 24 healthy volunteers.
  • Plaque accumulation was measured after a 4-day period without oral hygiene.
  • A standardized 48-second professional brushing was performed, followed by plaque re-scoring.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Approximately 40% of accumulated plaque was removed within the 48-second brushing period.
  • Buccal surfaces (approx. 45%) were cleaned more effectively than lingual surfaces (approx. 25%).
  • Minor differences in plaque removal were observed between toothbrush designs, with no single design proving significantly superior overall.

Conclusions:

  • No single manual toothbrush design demonstrated superior plaque removal efficacy in this standardized study.
  • The individual user's brushing technique is the most significant variable in achieving effective plaque removal.
  • The study suggests a standardized method could establish minimum toothbrush efficacy standards.